Techies are paying $700 a month for tiny bed ‘pods’ in downtown San Francisco::px-captcha

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s funny to me how many of the things we were told communism would bring about are now being experienced under the current economic system.

    • oolio@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      But that’s obviously because of the socialist elements left in the system. /s

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that there is not nearly as many good jobs in the rural areas, and most of the good jobs in tech related fields are moving employees back to the office, which means forcing people to work in big cities.

          • Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            People moved to Cali cuz Cali is awesome and beautiful. Iowa/ Nebraska not so much.

              • Dkarma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But my point is that Ohio is not one of those places…nor is Iowa. They both suck to look at much less the economy.

                It sounds like you’ve never been to Cali.
                So easy to fall in love with it.

                You think if it looked like Nebraska anyone would have stayed after the gold rush??? Lol

          • Clegko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a native Oklahoman, don’t tell people to move to Oklahoma. It’s a shit hole state.

      • kriz@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think thats true. Housing prices are high everywhere, I have friends and family in the midwest their shit is out of control too. New York and San Fran are the most extreme for sure but costs of renting or buying have like tripled everywhere over the last decade

  • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The USA is better than this. We should not be forcing people to live in tiny little dorms to work in our tech hubs due to housing costs. Build more apartments, fund it through corporate taxes and actually make San Francisco affordable for our brightest tech workers.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tech workers shouldn’t be working from an onsite location unless they’re touching hardware…there shouldn’t be a central location they’re all at anyways.

      • Anti-Antidote@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about shouldn’t. I think that there should always be the option to work remotely, but I much prefer to work in an office where I can have a separate mental space from home and be able to build meaningful relationships with my coworkers.

        • littlewonder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok but most of this can be solved by going to literally any co-working space.

          And as far as getting to know coworkers–wouldn’t you rather pick your friends from people you can choose to be around?

          Sorry, don’t take my spicy opinion personally. I think I’ve read too many dumbass return-to-office mandates that use stuff like your preference as leverage. Obviously, it’s not your fault they do that.

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Working in a coworking space has all the problems of office working without any of the benefits.

            I don’t need to be friends with my coworkers, but having non-scheduled interaction with them makes working with them much much easier. I worked on 3 different remote teams and I honestly don’t even think I could name most of my former coworkers, let alone recognize them.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not about picking friends. It’s about building trust and connection with the people you are already spending all this time with. It’s hard to tackle big challenges with people you barely know and don’t trust.

            Co working space? No thanks. That’s like a motel versus a home. They’re dirty and noisy. Our employer keeps a great office space with everything we need and no coworking space can compare. It’s also a permanent space we know after years of working there. And I’ll bump into more distant coworkers there just by chance. With co working spaces you basically have to plan specific days to meet specific people somewhere, and it cuts down on serendipitous connection.

          • Anti-Antidote@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            While a co-working space would indeed help with having a separate work environment, I disagree that it would help with the social part of my problem with remote work. Not only do I feel far less like I am “part of a team” when I’m with a remote team, but often it leads to a lot of friction on collaboration in my own work. I’m quite headstrong and have trouble reaching out for help when I’m stuck with things, and part of addressing that is lowering the friction involved in getting help as much as possible. Idk, this is all anecdote and maybe isn’t as applicable if you’re not doing software development, but it’s what I’ve experienced.

          • ThePizzaTimeBandit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My old company is a great example. They love to say collaboration and shit as a reason to be in office, but you need to ask your CO for permission to speak in office

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would love to see incentives to have people work from home in towns that need the population. I think a lot of people would like to live somewhere more rural if they didn’t have to commute… but we would need to fix public transportation if we did that. Otherwise we’re just adding more cars and miles.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I live rural, and wfh and have been for nearly a decade now. My cars get way less use than when I had to go into the office. Rural doesn’t mean more traveling and cars if you’re working from home.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t see the locals in such places taking kindly to any formal program to move people there. We can say “these areas need population” but they will say “it’s driving up rents and they’re a bunch of city slicking tech bros and we hate them.”

          The areas that truly, undeniably need population are so bombed-out that no one with any other options will live there.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everyone works well remote. I much prefer a hybrid model and honestly wouldn’t even consider working somewhere that’s 100% WFH. All that WFH does for me is decrease how much work I get done and make every waking moment in my home feel like work because I live in a 1 bedroom apartment.

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hybrid working is completely useless if you’re not in the same space as your coworkers.

            I get that some people don’t like working in person, but it’s much easier to get things done and to get short, off the cuff answers without sitting around blocked for 2 hours because nobody will take 2 minutes to answer a question.

      • grahamja@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t it be incredible if smaller tech companies spread out a bit? There are plenty of small towns in America that could use any form of industry to keep them alive.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There aren’t many skilled workers in those areas though, and you’d need a lot of money to convince people to move to a less desirable area just for you.

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      History suggests that the USA really isn’t better than this. If you ignore the post WWII boom period, workers being treated terribly is the norm.

      • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, no. Im not going to ignore the last 80 years. Of course progress takes time and future-looking we can still do much better. We have the means, we have the land, we have the know how.

        • 01011@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Workers have been treated progressively worse since the Reagan era. You’re really only talking about a few decades of labor progress in the last century followed by decline.

          • Gsus4@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And that was only because they had to beat the nazis and afterwards prove that capitalism wasn’t worse for common folk than communism. Once that credible bogeyman was gone, we were left with TINA, so they went back to screwing everyone over.

    • anubis119@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia article puts the pricing in Japan between 18 to 36 USD per night. That’s a range between 540 to 1080 USD per month. That makes San Francisco pricing average.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can’t really compare a per night pricing to a per month pricing. Per month is always cheaper that per night but you loose the flexibility.

        Anyway the price difference makes sense because SF housing is more expensive than Tokyo.

    • serratur@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They have much better standard, they have a door you can close, not just some curtains, the SF one is like a hostel.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t dislike the idea of people living in dormitories, but with a price of $700 it seems that should have a full height room.

  • onlinepersona
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can’t they work remotely? Why live in downtown SF? Seems like a waste of money.

    These look little more luxurious than the low-income housing in Beijing.

  • Porka_911@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rather a converted van, cheaper and serves two purposes as can guarantee that $700 does not include parking.

    • CandleTiger
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Presumably part of the draw for living in downtown San Francisco is you don’t need to pay for the upkeep and feeding of a car

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So sad. I am also afraid that in the future those kinds of accommodations will be thriving with people even more squeezed. Dystopian future.

  • Frylock@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I swear I remember a location like this in one of the newer Deus Ex games, which take place in a cyberpunk ish dystopia

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Deus Ex: Human Revolution, Adam Jensen, the game’s protagonist, searches for a computer hacker named Van Brugen and finds him hiding out in a place called Alice Pods in Hengsha, which is essentially a “hotel” composed of coffin-like closable pods with beds in them. Each guest rents a pod and can make use of the on-site facilities. It was communal living on a shoestring budget (or in Van Brugen’s case, hiding from the Pharmaceutical Megacorp trying to assassinate you).

      The funny part is that the fictional Alice Pods actually had more amenities than this real-life pod hotel does. They had washers and dryer units, private shower stalls and toilets, and even late-night food trucks in the common area serving up food.

      A cyberpunk dystopia actually wasn’t dystopian enough to match reality.

    • DecentralizeTheWorld@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are they idiots or are they unable to find housing within budget? Not sure about their rental situation. In Toronto you find ads for half a bed that you have to share for $500cad

      • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are idiots for staying in an area with prices that high if they aren’t making enough money to make it financially feasible

        • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What a lot of people do is work and live in SF as frugally as they can, save a few hundred thousand bucks, then move away

          • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wouldn’t be something I would go for but if people are going for this it sounds like hell of a way to get filthy rich and screw tenants. Investment opportunity?!? Do they pay a deposit I can steal as well??

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    $550 is the most I ever paid for a room there, but that was in 2000. My dad loves to talk about his $12 apartment on Sanchez back in 1965.