• odium
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why couldn’t they just orient this with North on the top like a sane individual?

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is technically true as survivors have plenty of land to move to when Moscow and St Petersburg are smouldering ruins. The UK has a lot less land and anywhere you move to is potentially still close to a fallout zone.

    Having said that, of the 5,000+ nukes Russia has, most of them are probably duds due to a lack of maintenance.

    • YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean that makes sense. But most of the population will be wrecked by just targeting those cities. Plus, at that point it really doesn’t matter because the world will pretty much be over.

      • Psiczar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree with you, the people living in a village in Siberia probably won’t notice any change other than the deer glowing at night.