• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It does not begin.

    It moves ahead of your perceptions.

    That said everything has already happened all at once and is over. Our sensual reality refuses to see that. We are too small to see it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).

      So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.

      in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    289 months ago
    The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed.
    

    The Economist, December 4, 2003, William Gibson

    • @dudinax
      link
      29 months ago

      Calculus is just starting to become general knowledge.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        long double future_time = static_cast(time(nullptr)) + (5.391247L * pow(10.0L, -44.0L))

        Fixed-precision arithmetic would probably be more appropriate here, but since I’m lazy, long double works. Although I am curious now if a long double has sufficient precision to give a meaningful value for this.

        • Dr. Bluefall
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I feel like at some point, you’d need arbitrary precision and arbitrarily-sized real numbers in order to meaningfully represent it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    129 months ago

    The future begins in the very next moment after the present.

    It’s a constantly moving boundary, always just ahead of the current moment.
    Philosophically or metaphorically, “the future” might be considered any time beyond the immediate present, whether that’s a second, an hour, a year, or a millennium from now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    It is a human concept that does not exist in reality, the future could for the universe have the same value of the past, the great snake eating its tail

  • Lotus Eater
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I feel like we’re in it lately with: the lab grown meat, 3D printing building and drones, CRISPR technology, and even something as “basic” as our smartphones.

    At this point the only thing that I’m waiting for is space travel 😎

    Edit: ugh, just read the rest of the responses and people are such bummers

    • Thelsim
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Thank you for your answer! Nice to see something besides a literal interpretation of the question (Though to be fair, it was also the first thing that popped in my head :)
      Anyway, I have to agree with you. A lot of things that seemed almost impossible or ridiculously far-fetched when I was little are now common place or close to becoming reality. And I’m not even that old! (forever in my early thirties *cough* *cough*)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The future is only a false perception of tomorrow, an illusion. Today you might say that tomorrow would be the future, but when tomorrow comes, you will do the same. The future does not exist, since time is not something static, is progressive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Thanks. I’m not a native English speaker, but my mom was a literature teacher in Kansas, so consequently I had to learn the language (I’m Dominican).