• Porka_911@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good. Now let’s put the tender to a BRITISH company. British pound paying a British company, with British jobs and tried and tested British engineers. Did I mention British?

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this case though, RR does have the experience and means to do it. They already make SMRs for submarines.

        TerraPower, on the other hand, has limited experience, nothing production-ready has ever been made by them, and they’ve hit all kinds of issues in their relatively short past.

        Plus of course the UK is going to go with RR over a company that in the past was trying to get close to the CCP and do data sharing/joint programmes.

          • stevecrox@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wikipedia lists all 12 subs as having Rolls Royce Pressured Water Reactors.

            Your PWR reuse idea is is kind of where Rolls Royce is looking to go with Small Modular Reactors (https://www.rolls-royce.com/innovation/small-modular-reactors.aspx).

            I suspect refurbishing decades old PWR reactors would be far more expensive than just building new ones, for example a SpaceX Merlin engine costs $1 million and a Blue Origin BE-4 costs $15 million. Nasa argued it would be ‘cheaper’ to reuse Shuttle components for the Space Launch System (SLS). Refurbishing Shuttle RS-25 engines has cost Nasa $50 million dollars per engine, restarting a production line is costing $100 million for each new RS-25 engine.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bit of a difference between a foreign startup you can’t control getting very close to them and RR, a company they can control and who isn’t reliant on them, doing a project for them.

            This really isn’t the gotcha you think it is, sorry.

            • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              RR literally gave the soviet union their realistic jet engine program because they wanted a few bucks.

              The damage to the west was incalculable.

              • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                RR didn’t, the UK govt did, and the Soviets copied it

                From your link

                However, in 1946, before the Cold War had really begun, the new British Labour government under the prime minister, Clement Attlee, keen to improve diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, authorised Rolls-Royce to export 40 Rolls-Royce Nene centrifugal flow turbojet engines. In 1958 it was discovered during a visit to Beijing by Whitney Straight, then deputy chairman of Rolls-Royce, that this engine had been copied without license

  • 0x0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one wants a BSOD in a nuclear reactor.

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great let’s build 4 down south then abandon the 2 in the North due to soaring costs