Not sure why this got removed from 196lemmy…blahaj.zone but it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong. Like an automatic DM or something

  • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    What? So just because I happen to agree with your stance, I also have to concede that there’s such a thing as objective morality?

    Morality is subjective by definition.

    • BellaDonna@mujico.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who down vote genuinely believe objective morality is possible, but it’s literally impossible and it’s incredibly obvious and self evident this is true.

      • Lemmy@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only self evident if you accept your own morality is subjective. There are people who think morality is defined by some invisible friend who is right about absolutly everything.

        • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea, plus divine commandment theory has so many holes, that it could be a sieve.

          “God created this world, hence god defines what is good”. Why?

          Let’s even agree to go with the statement above. How would you even verify that an entity was god while writing your commandments? Is it not possible that an organism with superior tech was trolling you?

          In a single line, how do you differentiate between God and an imposter?

          Just five minutes of thinking can lead to these questions that destroy divine commandment theory. People just refuse to think…