• Pika@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Said software must not be resource-intensive, or else you’ll have to do GPU passthrough, which not only adds a heap of complexity, but also requires a dedicated GPU.

    Also, I think it’s much easier to teach dual boot (just install Linux, most installers will do the rest automagically) than proper VM setups.

    Still, for experienced users, Windows VM is a brilliant option.

    • sobchak
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Yeah, can’t be GPU-intensive, but with modern CPUs, virtualization is pretty cheap. One application I had to use was Altium, and its 3d view was pretty laggy under a VM. I prefer KiCad. VMs seem easier than dual-boot to me, but that might just be out of familiarity.

      • Pika@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Dual-boot nowadays is super easy and doesn’t require any manual actions by the user - just install Linux, and if any other OS is present, GRUB will pick it up. Choose which OS you want to launch, and there you go.

        But VMs are great in that they can be run together with the host. There’s no need to reboot to get access to your Windows workflow, and things like WinApps allow to natively incorporate Windows apps into Linux desktop, as if they weren’t run by a Windows VM under the hood.

        So, indeed, if VM option is viable for a specific use case, it may as well be superior.