• jeremyparker
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? He has no linguistic expertise, and he didn’t have the perspective of the format’s popularity when he made that decree. And his decision was based on intentionally infringing on copyright. And it intentionally goes against the intuitive pronunciation. And the term “gif” now even refers to files that aren’t even .gif - it’s way past him.

      This may sound harsh, and I want to acknowledge that he did something really awesome - but the Jif pronunciation will not survive once he, as a person, is forgotten. But the format will. It’s not his anymore.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        his decision was based on intentionally infringing on copyright.

        you’re thinking of trademark, and .jif image file format would not, in fact, violate jif’s trademark on peanutbutter products.

        if you don’t know, you can just not say something.

        • jeremyparker
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, thanks for the tip.

          The point isn’t which word is legally accurate - I’m not taking anyone to court, and neither is Jif - the point is that it’s not a good basis for your branding.

    • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah. We’ve had that conversation before, with SCSI files. No one pronounces those as “sexy” despite the creator’s insistence on that being the correct pronunciation.