Bob* was riding across the Kurilpa Bridge into the city on a quiet school holiday Friday morning, also coincidentally World Car-Free Day, when … BAM, he was $464 poorer.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder if the fact that it’s not on a sign by itself, but combined with a bunch of other things, which could mean it’s unenforceable. It reminds me of (but is nowhere near as bad as) the signs on the way in to UQ:

    There are clear standard signs on the way out saying 60, but the only sign on the way in is part of a bigger sign including details about smoking, hazardous chemicals, and parking restriction hours. I’ve lived minutes away from the sign for a decade now and have ridden & walked past it many times, and didn’t even notice that sign existed until this year after someone made a comment about the speed limits online. The ones on Kurilpa and Goodwill are better than this, but they still mix the (advisory?) speed limit in with other stuff in a way that you could argue is confusing.

    • murbul@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wow that sign is extra ridiculous. I think most people would struggle to read it standing right in front of it let alone driving past.

      s316 does give a lot of leeway e.g.

      (b) the sign has additional information on or with it; or

      (e) the sign is combined on a single panel with 1 or more other traffic signs; or

      The point where it becomes substantially different is pretty subjective, which IMO shouldn’t be a thing when you’re talking about road rules, but it’s sadly not the only example.