• foxfell@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Totally agree, bitwarden is the best, can be selfhosted, free, their approach to community needs makes it worth donating.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I like to support devs who makes great products, excellent ones like bitwarden. Otherwise they will go away and we will be left with big tech products only. Because I don’t think people like to make excellent products and still don’t see a dime in their pocket.

        • Hexarei
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like to support devs, too - But I don’t like being forced into paying for access to features already present in software that is running on my own hardware. The code is already on my machine, I should be able to run it.

          That’s my biggest complaint about Bitwarden - I want to share passwords with my wife, and they want to charge me money for that even when I host it myself.

          • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is that really how it works? I thought it was all open source software? If it is I don’t see how you can be required to pay if you host it yourself?

            • Hexarei
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It is open source - but the server essentially locks you out of various functionality unless you create an account with Bitwarden and provide a valid subscription token.

              Sure, you can fork it and excise that code from it… but that’s too laborious and potentially error-prone, imho.

              If I were to selfhost bitwarden again, I’d go with Vaultwarden, which claims to be fully compatible and has no such requirements.