No, came from another person like you thinking it supported their argument, but it didn’t. 🤣🤣🤣 I think it may have even been one in that thesis, that you thought proved me wrong, except it doesn’t - it proved the thesis author wrong 🤣🤣🤣
The one you’ve been misquoting for months?
I haven’t misquoted any liar
The one you say you totally didn’t find on the Internet Archive, with that exact filename?
You know they’re all going to have the exact filename that the PDF had when it came with the printed textbook right?? 🤣🤣🤣 When I pointed this out to someone else they stopped replying in embarrassment, but doesn’t stop you from replying! 🤣🤣🤣
The one that even in your screenshot, just says brackets are “full symbolism” for order of operations, without magically reordering when exponents happen, sometimes?
That’s quite a word salad. I have no idea what your point is, if you even have one
the exact filename that the PDF had when it came with the printed textbook
The textbook from 1817?
You’re bad at this, and dumb enough to say out loud that you think responding and not responding both prove you right. The nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer and nobody you’ve ever talked to on this website goes away unaware that you’re just full of shit.
No, came from another person like you thinking it supported their argument, but it didn’t. 🤣🤣🤣 I think it may have even been one in that thesis, that you thought proved me wrong, except it doesn’t - it proved the thesis author wrong 🤣🤣🤣
I haven’t misquoted any liar
You know they’re all going to have the exact filename that the PDF had when it came with the printed textbook right?? 🤣🤣🤣 When I pointed this out to someone else they stopped replying in embarrassment, but doesn’t stop you from replying! 🤣🤣🤣
That’s quite a word salad. I have no idea what your point is, if you even have one
The textbook from 1817?
You’re bad at this, and dumb enough to say out loud that you think responding and not responding both prove you right. The nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer and nobody you’ve ever talked to on this website goes away unaware that you’re just full of shit.
You can’t even read your own screenshot.
There is no textbook from 1817 🤣🤣🤣
says person who keeps lying about what I said, and can never produce any screenshots of me saying the things they claim I said 🙄
There absolutely is a right answer - that’s the whole point to begin with! 🤣🤣🤣
says person lying yet again 🙄
says someone who doesn’t even know how to take and post screenshots 🙄
Picking a fight with the year Chrystal published is a new level of innumerate bullshit.
Nothing is real to you unless it’s in a JPEG inside a comment, and you don’t even know where they’re from. Broken robot.
How on Earth would I know that is the textbook you were referring to when you said 1817?? 🤣🤣🤣
Most of them are from my personal collection of textbooks dude
You can’t keep your own bullshit straight.
says someone who doesn’t even know what year which textbooks were published in 🤣🤣🤣
Case in point.
says person who thought one of the textbooks was from 1817 😂