Like how a(b+c) is the same no matter what you call it
It’s always (ab+ac), yes, except fpr those who follow a literally made up rule and claim, wrongly, that it’s ax(b+c) 🙄
But you don’t think a=b means b=a, so “the same” rolls right through both ears.
says person who doesnt’ know the difference between equals and identically equals, and made up the a=b, b=a example to ignore the actual example I gave that axb=ab, but ab does not equal axb, it equals (axb) .🙄 ab==(axb)
Check.
Any operation will show the accumulator… because there’s no stack.
It’s what you’ve been harassing people over for years.
Says someone who wasn’t even capable of checking if that was the right model! 😂😂😂 Will take that as an admission of being wrong, again
says liar who is contradicted by the manual, and tried to pass off an emulator for a different model to try and hide that
says liar. The usual then, go get a screenshot of me saying that. I’ll wait 😂
They do the same thing.
Like how a(b+c) is the same no matter what you call it.
But you don’t think a=b means b=a, so “the same” rolls right through both ears.
It’s always (ab+ac), yes, except fpr those who follow a literally made up rule and claim, wrongly, that it’s ax(b+c) 🙄
says person who doesnt’ know the difference between equals and identically equals, and made up the a=b, b=a example to ignore the actual example I gave that axb=ab, but ab does not equal axb, it equals (axb) .🙄 ab==(axb)
Textbooks say one means the other and you performatively pretend nuh-uh. It’s saying they are identical.
says person unable to cite any such textbook 🙄
ab==(axb), yes, that’s what == means, identically equal
“The multiplication sign is often not included between letters, e.g. 3ab means 3 * a * b.” Page 31 of the PDF. Next page: “3(x+y) means 3*(x+y).”
It’s saying they’re identical.