• TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how many fuck cars people will buy a car when they finally graduate and get a job and realise they want 1 hr 30 commuting every day instead of 3 hours?

    My wife and I own two cars and live outside the most urban parts of our city. I actually love cars, especially when I get to drive a standard transmission. But we both are firmly in the FuckCars camp.

    We walk, bike, and use public transit when we can, and we vote to improve the pedestrian infrastructure in our area whenever we can. We love vacationing in places with good public transit, and would live in such places if circumstances allowed.

    Part of the frustration in the FuckCars community is the very thing you said in your post. Cities are built around cars, which means every other form of commuting is secondary and therefore worse than it could be. This is what we want to change. Build cities around people. Get rid of massive parking lots, dangerous stroads, etc. If people need cars to get from city to city, or outside of cities, totally fine. But they shouldn’t be necessary for day-to-day in populated areas.

    Cities could be so much better, and we know this because there ARE cities that are better. It just takes effort and time.

    • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cities could be so much better, and we know this because there ARE cities that are better. It just takes effort and time.

      And eminent domain, to take the land to build that infrastructure. And money. Lots and lots of money. And way more time than you think. Effectively having to level homes for miles, grade the surface and then, finally getting to build this utopian vision of public transportation, which will then need to be fed, sorry, maintained, by taxes that will shoot through the roof. Then, the displaced will need a place to stay, so enter yet more eminent domain to take more property to build vertical, because there is a finite amount of land. And this would be jn just one small to mid sized US city.

      Look, I’m happy for anyone who’s happy in how they do their daily. You chose it, and it works for you. Some people don’t chose that life, and it doesn’t work for them. I respect your way of life, it should only be fair that you respect mine. I’m not driving a 3500 turbo diesel that gets 12 gallons to the mile, stomping on the gas “just because I like the sound” and throwing cheeseburger wrappers out the window.

      Difference is, I’m not trying to force my way of life on others…

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Infinite money if we want to do it immediately. Don’t be so defeatist. Changing hearts, minds, and infrastructure is not immediate.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are plenty of good solutions. Just because you’re only hearing the very valid complaints doesn’t mean solutions don’t exist. They just aren’t going to be easy or immediate. Life doesn’t work that way.

            Cars are indeed here to stay. But we can make cities much better over time.

              • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I believe I did mention cars as valuable for use outside of cities. I live in the US, cars are an absolute necessity outside of major population centers.

                Even so, cities are better when cars are unnecessary within them. CAPABLE, but unnecessary.

                  • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yup, I’ve been there. The story is the same with Paris and NYC. I still prefer those cities over, say, Los Angeles. Cities that have made an effort to be livable without cars are better than cities that haven’t.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t have to give up personal transportation to build public transportation. Are you high? And no, it does not take infinite money. How the fuck do you think that they’re are cities who have already implemented decent public transportation got them? They certainly did not have infinite money.

        Are you always this defeatist?

      • namingthingsiseasy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one is forcing people to live in more efficient urban centers. What’s truly asinine though is that these are practically non-existent in North American (and the USA in particular). And in some places, it’s even illegal!

        Again, no one is forcing you to live in one. But why are people so hellbent on ensuring that no one does?