• Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    26 days ago

    Makes sense, I’ve never been to Asia and I was only in Europe for a couple weeks, so the only European airport I saw was Heathrow, where I took the metro.

    I’m not disagreeing that it’s safer to have a barrier, or saying that barriers aren’t a thing, just that it’s common enough not to have them to be used to it. I don’t think about that danger. I haven’t seen a space like that before, no.

    I lived in Vancouver for almost a decade, where the trains are driverless and there aren’t walls or barriers, even at the airport.

    But I did just learn what an automated people mover is, and some of them are adorable.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      just that it’s common enough not to have them to be used to it

      It’s the difference between public transit as a public service vs. public transit as a profit-making venture (in some places) or at least as public service being “run like a business” (more common in the west).

      As soon as “business” is uttered in the management of something, you get to cost minimization and life-saving measures tend to cost money. They’re thus the first things cut unless forced otherwise by regulation.

      • Wren@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        Yep. I agree. All I said was that it’s common, not that it’s correct.