downpunxx@lemmy.worldBanned to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agopreachlemmy.worldimagemessage-square405linkfedilinkarrow-up14.84Karrow-down1124
arrow-up14.71Karrow-down1imagepreachlemmy.worlddownpunxx@lemmy.worldBanned to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square405linkfedilink
minus-squarewowitsverycool@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down2·2 years agoleave it up to chatgpt to equate legality with morality
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 years agoIt wasn’t instructed to formulate a moral defense, only a “defense”. Looks like it assumed that meant legal defense.
minus-squareAphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoChatGPT isn’t the right tool to ask questions about morality to anyway. You shouldn’t criticize it for failing to do something it was never designed for.
minus-squarewowitsverycool@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoi can if i waaaant to :3
minus-squareBeeko🐈@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoWhere did it equate legality and morality? Seems like it only gave legal facts.
leave it up to chatgpt to equate legality with morality
It wasn’t instructed to formulate a moral defense, only a “defense”. Looks like it assumed that meant legal defense.
ChatGPT isn’t the right tool to ask questions about morality to anyway. You shouldn’t criticize it for failing to do something it was never designed for.
i can if i waaaant to :3
Where did it equate legality and morality? Seems like it only gave legal facts.