I’ve been using Brave for the past three or so years but I do know that Linux/privacy enthusiasts tend to swear by Firefox. Wanted to get people’s thoughts on this topic to see if I should be making a potential switch. Thanks!

  • Voxel@feddit.deEnglish
    719·
    1 year ago

    Please provide any evidence for your false claim.

      • Voxel@feddit.deEnglish
        31·
        1 year ago

        The CEO was before CEO of Mozilla lmao, but stepped back, because the entire Internet hated Firefox, because of his political opinion.

      • Engywuck@lemmy.mlEnglish
        512·
        1 year ago

        The CEO also has some controversial views on the Corona virus and LGBTQ rights.

        Completely unrelated to “security” or “privacy”.

          • Engywuck@lemmy.mlEnglish
            310·
            1 year ago

            Again, this has nothing to do with technical issue regarding privacy or security. People are just making excuses. Don’t use it if you prefer something else, but don’t mix non-relevant stuff or paranoia in a semi-technical discussion.

            By the way, that’s funny. In a similar way, I hope that you or other virtue-signaling people, don’t buy stuff on Amazon (i.e., support them) as the are notoriously mistreating their warehouse workers. Yes, it’s unrelated. I’m just point out a blatant hypocrisy.

              • Engywuck@lemmy.mlEnglish
                38·
                1 year ago

                “Private/secure” is in the title and has nothing to do with the political/social view of the CEO. Until abuse of power happens/is proven, there’s no point in spreading FUD, fear-mongering and manipulation. As if FF and Mozilla didn’t have their fair share of controversies as well…

                Don’t even bother replying, this is going to be my last comment in this thread (and probably in this sub, as I’m tired of discussion on “privacy-oriented” subs becoming paranoid every-fucking-time).

                Good luck.

                • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlEnglish
                  33·
                  1 year ago

                  Until abuse of power happens/is proven, there’s no point in spreading FUD, fear-mongering and manipulation.

                  So, should we first wait for the abuse and harm to happen first, when nothing can be done by powerless individuals?

          • Engywuck@lemmy.mlEnglish
            15·
            1 year ago

            Again, this has nothing to do with technical issue regarding privacy or security. People are just making excuses. Don’t use it if you prefer something else, but don’t mix non-relevant stuff in a semi-technical discussion.

            By the way, that’s funny. In a similar way, I hope that you or other virtue-signaling people, don’t buy stuff on Amazon (i.e., support them) as the are notoriously mistreating their warehouse workers. Yes, it’s unrelated. I’m just point out a blatant hypocrisy.

    • 133arc585@lemmy.mlEnglish
      94·
      1 year ago

      Depends on what you call a scam. I am not sure it’s the right word, but duplicitous behavior and definite privacy violations (even if by negligence) are absolutely true.

      They have sent out direct mailers that basically equated to a customer list leak; also I’d take a peek at the wikipedia entry about their business model, which mentions some stuff that isn’t the most savory:

      … Brave earns revenue from ads by taking a 15% cut of publisher ads and a 30% cut of user ads. User ads are notification-style pop-ups, while publisher ads are viewed on or in association with publisher content.

      On 6 June 2020, a Twitter user pointed out that Brave inserts affiliate referral codes when users navigate to Binance

      In regards to the mailers, they messed up and passed blame,

      In this process, our EDDM vendor made a significant mistake by not excluding names, but instead including names before addresses, resulting in the distribution of personalized mailers.

      With regards to the CEO, he made a donation to an anti-LGBT cause when he was CEO of Mozilla in 2008. He lost his job at Mozilla due to his anti-LGBT stance.

      He also spreads COVID misinformation.

      • Voxel@feddit.deEnglish
        21·
        1 year ago

        Tbh. Mozilla wasn’t better in the past and as long it doesn’t affect the product I don’t mind the political views of the owner (it’s still concerning). As long Brave can provide me better privacy and security for my daily browsing I will continue using and recommending it. And listening to Wikipedia he stepped back, by himself.

      • Unlucky_Boot3467@lemmy.worldEnglish
        418·
        1 year ago

        Really loving how a CEO’s political views somehow fucking matter the security of a browser lmao. God I fucking hate this generation