• DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not another toothless advisory panel.

    It would’ve been a constitutionally supported advisory, with demonstrated will of the Australian people. That wouldn’t be so easily ignored.

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It literally would be another toothless advisory panel because it was not going to have any power. Being constitutionally supported just means it has to exist in some unspecified form. There was no “demonstrated will of the Australian people” in it.

      You know what does have the demonstrated will of the Australian people? That the proposed voice was a bad idea. That shouldn’t be ignored.