Programmers can answer all existential questions with ease

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Except with cloning the other twin would be a different age as with current tech the clone is back to being a baby. You’d need rapid growth tech and mind transfer tech to at least make the clone have the same age, memories and personality, although that would most likely introduce other differences.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        There is at least one case of parents, told at a very early stage that they’re expecting twins, deciding to remove and freeze one of the embryos for later reimplantation, so even with actual identical twins, they can be different ages.

        But yes, transferring minds is not something we can do. I’m not sure it’s something we’ll ever be able to do.

        Should it actually become possible, I assume that certain parties would even advocate for the unique life/lives of the clone(s). The argument would be that the clones’ chance at life shouldn’t be overwritten by other being’s attempts at extension of life.

        “Ethical minefield” doesn’t even begin to cover it!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    They are, on the exact moment they are cloned. On the next attosecond they are not.

    Edit: Well, if they are cloned on the cellular level, otherwise it’s just NO.

  • raubarno
    link
    fedilink
    2011 months ago

    If you fork a process, then it’s the two separate processes but sharing the same memory with copy-on-write mapping.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      Is that actually more efficient if I need my child process to do something different with different data?

      • raubarno
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        It’s more efficient for memory until you start working with different data. Threads also rely on the same syscall on Linux, clone(2), but they don’t share the entire context by default, so they’re more lightweight. It is recommended to use pthreads(3) API instead of fork(2).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If you just clone a reference to them, then you are just pointing another finger at them.

    Is this really an analogy that resonates with programmers today?

    • Big P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      If you clone a reference to someone you have a completey separate body but any actions taken affect the original as well

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        I believe it is just a wormhole pointing to the original so even if it may look like another body it’s just the original being manipulated through the warped spacetime continuum

  • candyman337
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The real answer btw is no, cloned animals aren’t identical to their original, same base traits, but for example in cows spot position will be different

    Also unless you can copy their memories, they just won’t be the same person.

    And then they’d have two different life experiences and would immediately begin to differ.

    • andrew_bidlaw
      link
      fedilink
      711 months ago

      And we also change every milisecond. How long this process takes? It may seem irrelevant but copy of you 5 seconds ago is not you now. It’s your restored back up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Unless your pause execution of the original or there’s an ongoing synchronization during the cloning process

        • andrew_bidlaw
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Sync would lag anyway, I think, if we are pedantic.

          Pausing the execution of the original via execution solves the problem of who’s original here tho. One’s still functioning.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            Well it depends on the method of sync… Doing it through updates would lag, but what if it was through something like quantum effects, or even by treating both bodies and brains like a contiguous organism until the cloning is complete? Like with a cell dividing, there’s no original

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      So it’s kind of like the moment of inception is the memory reference, and they won’t ever be the same?

      • candyman337
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        They’re now two people who will love two different lives, they will naturally begin to diverge

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 months ago

    Huh. Now my confusion about the chicken and the egg debate makes a lot more sense, it seems odd to me that such an easily answered question ended with so much confusion

    I’m now realizing it’s only a debate with non programmers, I thought it was a mutual ADHD communication thing, now I’m realizing maybe it’s just because they learned about inheritance

  • _NoName_
    link
    fedilink
    111 months ago

    Imagine if you saw someone who looked exactly like you and mimicked your exact actions, but they were just 3 or 4 feet to the left of you. That’s by reference (I think)

    Contrasting an exact copy of you that can think for itself and has autonomy, which is by value (I think)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      By value could be described as, the exact same as you at the time of cloning, but it will be its own object and in no way connected to your actions.

      Whereas by reference would be exactly what you described