• Rekall Incorporated@piefed.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t mean restrict, I am talking more about market demand.

    Desktops are a bettee fit in terms of cooling and power availability for long throughout tasks (not burst type use cases).

    These is a reason why both Framework and Nvidia have released desktops with large unified memory options (as well as many smaller mini-pc manufacturers) and not laptops.

    • sunstoned@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Does the word “Macbook” ring a bell? They’ve been shipping unified memory in laptops with pretty resounding success for quite a while now.

      Unified memory technology clearly doesn’t require desktop-level cooling and power availability, although it can of course make use of it.

      • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.socialM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure, but overwhelming majority of people buy Macbooks because of the design and ecosystem, not because of unified memory.

        Of course it doesn’t require desktop-level cooling and power availability, but chances are if you’re not running MacOS (which has a broad set of use cases, including ones where unified memory is not the key adoption driver), you do want to make use of the additional power and cooling. That’s why I cited the Nvidia Spark, the Framework desktop and the AMD-based mini-PCs with unified memory). There is a reason why Framework, known for making laptops, went with a desktop solution for a unified memory desktop.

        I am willing to bet, Nvidia is not going to offer large memory sizes on their N1 SoC, they want people to buy the Spark and that’s not their target area.