cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42161026
A number of pro-gun rights Republicans pushed back on the administration’s argument that Alex Pretti was dangerous because he had a gun. Pretti was legally licensed to carry one.
A war of words over deeply held beliefs erupted on the political right in the hours after a federal agent shot and killed Alex Pretti on a Minneapolis street Saturday, pitting top officials in Donald Trump’s administration against Second Amendment defenders in his electoral base.
At the core of the debate is that Pretti — who was permitted to carry a gun in public in Minnesota — had a concealed firearm on his person that eyewitness videos show federal agents apparently discovering and removing during the altercation that led to his death. Videos do not appear to show Pretti holding the weapon during that confrontation.
Kristi Noem sought to justify the killing by asserting at a news conference that Pretti “attacked those officers, had a weapon on him, and multiple dozens of rounds of ammunition, wishing to inflict harm on these officers coming, brandishing like that and impeding their work that they were doing.” No evidence has been provided to back up this account.
The only thing this story demonstrates is that having a gun just makes you a target for fascists. No gun has yet ‘protected’ anyone at these events. How does making yourself a more obvious targrt protect you? Your fucking brain is mush.
I DO support the 2A, but merely posessing a gun isn’t enough to do shit, and you fucking morons do not even begin to understand what comes next.
These cowardly thugs would not be terrorizing openly armed communities. Especially on private property where it’s perfectly legal to have armed security on the premise and deny unlawful entry.