Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn’t make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability.
Your point? Not to detract from her awfulness, but neither of these documents implicate JK Rowling in pedophilia.
At a minimum, pedo apologist.
Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds?
I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there.
Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn’t make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability.