• fidodo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        The hard part is scaling and building a user base, but threads simply bootstrapped both off Instagram so it probably wasn’t hard for them to make.

            • ex_redditor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Anybody can make a twitter that can handle 100 users. The challenge is making worth at the scale of twitter

              • Snapz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, but the “scale of Twitter” becomes a more and more accessible goal by the day. elon fires everyone and intentionally breaks everything while only new feature releases are “new and exciting” paid tiers of horseshit that nobody wants. I’m not paying a penny for the privilege to yell into his sad, shrinking room with the remaining 17 nazis, 4200 corporate brands and 1.75 million bots that are left to make up its userbase.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah yeah, probably because Twitter was originally written in Ruby on Rails and it’s always nice to do exercises that feel like something real. But yeah, making things actually scale is pretty difficult and they felt they had to move from RoR to something else (Scala in this instance).

              Of course, Elon Musk probably fired everyone responsible for making it scale properly, so at this point, stopping the growth of Twitter is probably good, because otherwise it might run into issues again.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet they copied some code for mastodon and paid Gargron to not try to go after them. That would definitely give them a huge lift. Otherwise, I don’t see how they were able to quickly come up with this. Tech companies take forever to build stuff usually

  • SomeoneElse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve just remembered “I’m a free speech absolutist, but not when it comes to parodies of me” and “tweeting my publicly available flight logs is sending out assassination coordinates”. What a joke of an individual. Cry more Elmo.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      109
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in the EV market right now, looking for a good commuter car, and Tesla went from my #1 spot to one of the last options. It’s amazing how well he tanked that whole business. Luckily there’s a ton of competition cheaters now

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        A conservative was talking at me a few weeks ago about how much he loved how Musk was pissing off the libs and about how he’s a shrewd businessman. I asked if he would buy a Tesla and he said never. He didn’t have a response when I told him Musk doesn’t sound like a good businessman.

      • Wooly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My dad was going to buy a Tesla up until a few years ago, there’s far more and better competition nowadays. And it’s really seeming Tesla’s are actively dangerous.

          • Wooly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure seems like it, and I see an article every other week about the self driving aspect hurting someone or getting into trouble. Just not worth the hassle.

      • thisbenzingring@wirebase.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is at the top of your list? I’m leaning towards the Ford Mach E with awd but have only looked deeply at half of what is available. Tesla is at the bottom of my list also

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mach e is up there. Currently number one spot is the Hyundai ioniq 6, it looks like a direct competitor to the model 3. Nissan leaf and I think Honda are in the running too. Idk gotta start test driving to really know. I’ll still test drive a model 3, but from what I hear and see I probably won’t go for it

          • Ophy@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Ioniqs are absolutely sexy vehicles, they’re at the top of my list too!

          • Rexios@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was in the same boat as you having the Tesla be my dream car until all this Twitter shit hit the fan. My roommate has an Ioniq 5 which I liked so much I got an Ioniq 6 as soon as it came out. I absolutely love it.

          • GeminiFrenchFry@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My friend bought a 22 leaf last year and from what I know, she loves it. It definitely took some getting used to! We still normally take my car on road trips, though.

          • Venutian Spring@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Man those Ioniqs look so good in person too. I’m considering buying one for my wife next year, if I can convince her to get ride of her beloved Prius

          • netwren@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well their brake lights wouldn’t turn on during regenerative braking and Hyundai has had some bouts of hacking scandals. But I have heard owners saying food things about them.

        • degrix@lemmy.hqueue.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve had my Mach-E GT for two years now and it’s been very reliable and very comfortable. There were a couple of small hiccups early on, but I can’t see going back to non-electric cars. Would definitely buy it again!

        • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          My parents got a 2021 Mach E and they love it. I’ve driven it a few times. I’m eyeing one for my next car too, though I’ve also been interested in Hyundai’s offerings. I’ve never wanted a Hyundai in my life but their new EV lineup looks pretty compelling.

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just include a reaching leg thingy as well then you can drive from the right side too. Musk, if you do this I will sue you for “cheating”.

      • billygoat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, from what I heard he barely spends his time with Tesla these days due to being preoccupied with twitter 😂

    • tracyspcy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have even forgotten he is in cars business, more news from him when he is manipulating crypto prices

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What grinds my gears the most is that every fucking manufacturer sucks at software and usability so hard it hurts every time. I rather have bad UX than bow to this moron though.

    • mainaccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re in California, be aware that there’s a hidden/sneaky “EV tax” and you’ll be paying (nearly) double registration fees every year. Mine went from $330 to alamost $700.

      Also public charging is starting to be a problem as there’s not nearly enough charging stations and CA does nothing about it.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I wouldn’t call it sneaky, it’s not like a conspiracy or anything. Most states pay for road maintenance and projects from gas taxes. Since EVs don’t use gas but still use roads they should pay their share too, so it makes sense it’d come from the registration. It’s still way less than paying for gas or taxes on gas.

        • TGTX@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Should be a variable charge like a gas tax placed on public EV chargers and not a one time yearly fee. There is a big consumption difference between a Hummer EV and a Smart EV.

          EDIT: Not every state has thought clearly about additional EV fees. Starting later this year, Texans who drive electric cars will pay significantly more in registration fees than an average gas car driver pays in gas taxes each year…because it’s fucking Texas.

          • Rexios@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The issue with taxing public charging is you can just charge at home to avoid the tax. Also there are many public level 2 chargers that are free.

            • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d much rather pay a flat extra tax than have my personal charging habits monitored. I don’t need any more spies in my home trying to charge me based on my behaviors. I’d rather pay the flat fee and keep my privacy.

      • SuperIce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re also not paying gas taxes though. They have to make up the lost gas tax revenue somehow. Realistically, it should be based on the miles driven and the weight of the car (road damages increases exponentially with the weight of the vehicle), but for now they just have that flat EV tax.

    • BB69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Try charging a non Tesla while on a road trip, you’ll learn fast.

      • Rexios@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just went MA -> TN -> OH -> MA and only had one place where all stations were offline, but they came back within a half hour.

        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve never had a Tesla supercharger be offline.

          However I’ve had several EA chargers derated, one at 30kWh. Not to mention broken stalls. Or how about EA charging me the full price even though I paid for their membership thing?

          ChargePoint never hit full speed on my last trip.

          A random CCS station did better than any of the big names.

          Tesla is by far the most reliable, why do you think auto companies are changing to NACS?

  • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not cheating to hire the workers you unceremoniously fired to save money asshole. It’s called capitalism.

    Then again, every super wealthy capitalist doesn’t actually want capitalism. They want feudalism, where nobody else is allowed to compete with them and if someone makes them angry they can banish them from society without trial.

    • float@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually they don’t allow competition, this one is a bit special because it involves two billionaires and it’s basically a show-off. The regular case is: they buy any potential competitor in an early stage and let it die. The 5% of the start-up CEOs that don’t just take the few hundred millions will face a nasty attack where they steal employees or do some negative marketing or whatever sabotage fits.

  • Radioaktvt@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Competition is fine” says the guy that was born into wealth and was given a huge leg up in life. Although, I really hope they duke it out in court with Meta just so they burn through piles of money needlessly.

    • Stan@lemmywinks.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m thinking their lawyers are already on retainer and being paid anyway? The money they waste will be taxpayers funding the court system.

      • Radioaktvt@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought being on retainer meant that they get paid to be ready to take on a case if needed and ensure they get at least partially paid for their services. I bet a major case like this would call for a whole team of lawyers all billing for hundreds of hrs of work. I don’t think a retainer would cover everything. I could be wrong though, I’m not a lawyer.

        • Stan@lemmywinks.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a lawyer either. But this will definitely fuck up someone’s day at the pro shop.

    • whoami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Scaling it to Twitter’s size is the difficult part. Although Elon has been doing some excellent work in bringing decades worth of engineering work into decay within the short span of the past 9 months.

      • Saneless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Facebook is significantly larger than Twitter, in the Billions (depressing). Guessing they have decent ideas how to scale an operation in the 10s of millions of people.

        I wonder if Elon helped bolster engineering jobs in other companies. Like “See what happens when you get rid of the engineers you think you don’t need?”

        • whoami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Meta (for better or worse - definitely for worse) definitely is one of the few entities with the engineering expertise to pull it off. As for driving Twitter employees to its competitors, that’s definitely happened.

          Last I heard, Twitter’s engineering team now mostly consists of a skeleton crew, and the only reason they’re likely there is because of the terms on their H1B Visas.

          edit: Slightly misread the second point. Given the rounds of mass layoffs in tech companies, I am not sure Elon’s Twitter has served as much as a warning as it should’ve.

        • fidodo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Threads is bootstrapped off Instagram. People I know who tried it out like it because they don’t need to rebuild their network, it just copies the Instagram followers over so you start with all your follows and followers. Instagram also has over 2 billion users so they probably just tacked this on top of the existing Instagram infrastructure and called it a day. Instagram already supported comments so the backend for this probably required minimal changes.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welfare queen, that relies on government subsidies to run his business, accuses other billionaires of cheating in the market. Hilarious

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What they do is pass laws to make their cheating legal and therefore not cheating, while making actual honest competition illegal, and therefore cheating. The game is easy when it’s rigged.

    • asal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Poaching Twitter employees and stealing “trade secrets”.

      Because you know, it has nothing to do with the fact that Threads is basically just Instagram with no pictures.

        • ziggurism@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol that’s hilarious. Court case will probably just be quietly withdrawn. Or loudly thrown out.

          • coldv@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like the thought of a long awkward silence in the courtroom and Elon’s lawyer quietly shuffle out.

      • ziggurism@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t the FTC in the process of banning non-compete agreements? So the rules that Musk is claiming were broken are on their way out?

        • axtualdave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          NCAs are already largely unenforceable anyway. Federal and state laws prohibit them except in cases of direct competition and the employee having specialized knowledge or skills. And even then, they can’t be for long periods of time, and if they would prevent the employee from a livelihood they can’t be enforced.

          Usually what happens is someone who has a NCA will be hired by a new employer. That employer will see how long the NCA is in force and just have the employee on the payroll but not working until it expires. That, or they will pay the penalty in the NCA, whichever is cheaper.

          • ziggurism@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Twitter is in direct competition with Facebook/meta/threads. And Twitter layoffs were 6 months or less ago. And these guys presumably have specialized knowledge.

            So it seems like many of the criteria would be met.

        • fidodo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it’s already illegal in California where both Twitter and Facebook are headquartered

        • Xanvial@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          NCA usually for employees that resigned. That would be messed up if they can just hire some smart people and immediately fires them to block them for joining competitors