Most ethernet cable is UTP, literally “unshielded twisted pair.” Shielded cable is much more expensive and less physically flexible due to the metal jackets, so people dont tend to buy it by default.
You can argue the jacket is shielding, but mostly ethernet cable is not shielded. The braiding will cause problems, but likely very minor ones based on the length of the the run that CRC will compensate for.
Yes, in theory. But in practice it depends on the frequencies.
Even if interference is insignificant, looping the wires around a metal core (which braiding does) creates a different impedance and can degrade the signal.
I don’t think I’ve seen a single data cable that didn’t have some kinda shielding since the early nineties.
The IEEE specs up to 2.5GBaseT do not specify any shielding for cabling.
Most ethernet cable is UTP, literally “unshielded twisted pair.” Shielded cable is much more expensive and less physically flexible due to the metal jackets, so people dont tend to buy it by default.
You can argue the jacket is shielding, but mostly ethernet cable is not shielded. The braiding will cause problems, but likely very minor ones based on the length of the the run that CRC will compensate for.
Would the twisted pairs prevent cross talk between two separate cables like it does individual wires?
Yes, in theory. But in practice it depends on the frequencies.
Even if interference is insignificant, looping the wires around a metal core (which braiding does) creates a different impedance and can degrade the signal.
Granted I’m no network engineer. But I have made many of my own cat5’s through the years and I have not seen one since I was unable to legally drive.