Recently mullvad stopped the port forwarding, are there some other trustworthy VPN to do Torrenting out there or others solutions to do torrenting with Mullvad?

  • SmallAlmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m deeply sorry, but I had to mention i2p torrenting, it might become more popular soon.

    Sidenote: I2P torrenting doesn’t require a vpn or port forwarding, and is indeed more private.

      • Zpiritual@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems to be a special torrent client that work similar to tor (guessing with less hops though) and bounce encrypted traffic on special “i2p routers”. Not sure if they do the onion style encryption of thor.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I2P torrenting with a seedbox is the undeniable future. It will probably just take a year or so to reach critical mass. It’s slow now because a lack of mass.

      The main relevant difference between I2P and Tor is that Tor runs on donated bandwidth and therefore can’t scale: the more it is used, the more volunteers are needed to donate bandwidth. Which is why they aren’t happy with people torrenting.

      I2P is P2P so the more people use it, the faster it becomes. Which is why they really want people to use it for torrenting.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once all major bittorrent clients support it with integrated I2P routers, the hassle is literally just checking a box, which will be on by default in many clients.

          Remember when trackers were being taken down and we all switched to DHT/magnet? Same will happen if they go after VPN’s, we will switch to I2P. And it seems they are going after VPN’s.

        • tom@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I downloaded something recommended because I was curious and genuinely could not make heads or tails of what I was looking at. I’ve got about 4 pis and 80tb of storage kicking around, for context. Just noped out after a couple days

  • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    ProtonVPN. It’s an organization built around principles of privacy, so I use them a lot and support them as much as I can. I have their VPN on a docker container with gluetun.

    • pineapplelover@readit.buzz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a proton unlimited subscriber and I love it. Simplelogin, e2ee emails, vpn, all amazing. Their tech support team is awesome and they have always been fast and helpful when assisting me with my computers.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        E2ee emails is only between proton and proton btw, proton to gmail (or anyone else) is not emcrypted by default, you’d need to pgp it yourself for that.

        I know that may sound obvious, but you’d be surprised how many people don’t know that so I just wanted to drop a heads up just in case anyone reading was unaware.

      • DahGangalang@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like proton mail and use it for my daily, but I’ve heard rumors it’s a fed honeypot. Seems like a good choice to escape corporate big data collection, but probably want to avoid it for anything of questionable legality.

        • Kcg@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea great to get away from those damn adverts. I often wonder with enough pressure would they comply with a government or as you said are they a honey pot themselves. In europe Encrochat was a good example of it happening.

    • truami
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      +1 for Proton. I also have their mail for all my domains. Works wonders and feels trustworthy, for whatever that’s worth.

      • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t need to be in a container, but it works well in one for my use case. I use it in a headless server running OpenMediaVault with qBittorrent and a bunch of arr apps. The apps are all in containers sharing a network with port forwarding set up, so that none of them leak any DNS information.

      • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Running it with Gluetun makes me think they are just using that container to attach other containers to a VPN, so only the services that need to be behind a VPN.

        I use a similar setup on my server, where all of my media is virtualized and containerized.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I switched to after Mullvad removed their port forwarding. It works fine so far. Interestingly, the Android app reminds me of a Geocities page circa 2002.

      • Zpiritual@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No they’ve committed to keeping it. But they have an issue with port availability so they’ll probably need to move to a per server allocation eventually. Recently they reduced the allocation per user down to 5 from 20 though just to delay when they run out.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do if you want to seed or use private trackers otherwise you can make any incoming connections.

        • Marauder20@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is faster because they are losing subscribers, and because their remaining subscribers are having more difficulty connecting to peers due to lack of PF. I switched to Air VPN and was actually surprised how fast it was compared to Mullvad. (the Canadian servers at least, haven’t tried many of the other servers).

          • snow_storm55@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Makes sense. My average upload amount dropped by 50%, too. What download speeds do you get with airvpn? I have 1 Gbps so anything below 80 MB/s wouldn’t be worth switching.

  • Marauder20@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Air VPN as it supports port forwarding. PF isn’t as important if you only download popular new content, as there are usually enough connectable seeders on popular torrents. But PF is absolutely crucial if you want to be able to obtain old or rare content or if you use private trackers.

    I’m honestly baffled that so many are still recommending Mullvad after they made such a stunning reversal of their friendly policy towards p2p by removing port forwarding. I wouldn’t trust them as far as I can throw them.

    • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Switched to AirVPN. It’s pretty good so far. Not great for general browsing because you get a ton of captchas.

    • Emet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to use Air but the speeds were absolutely abysmal. 2-3 MB/s vs 50-55 MB/s on mullvad. Has the situation improved at all?

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude it’s insane how many people here A) don’t even know what port forwarding is and B) tell others port forwarding isn’t needed at all.

      Where does all this confusion come from?

    • amprebel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their decision to block port forwarding was unfortunate, but understandable. I’ve been using it for the past year and when I first started, I rarely ran into any issues with being blacklisted. Now it’s a nearly daily occurrence. I don’t know how true it is, but Mullvad claimed that much of the activity leading to blocked IPs came from activity related to port forwarding. If that’s true, then I’d say the decision is good. Like others have said, torrenting is still possible without port forwarding, but it’s also true that rarer content and private trackers become difficult. Ultimately there was no perfect solution here.

    • LemmyLaLibre@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mullvad is nice because you don’t need to make an account or sign up with an ID or phone number. Plus you can pay with monero.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They used to be Denver-based, but got bought out by a shitty British mega corporation with shit policies, so I dropped them for Nord, which also sucked because their servers were slow.

      • rov3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I though Nord has always struggled with security. They had a breach a couple years ago right? Customer info got leaked?

    • unce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had PIA for years. It has always worked so I haven’t had a reason to try anything else. I think its like $2/mo paid yearly.

  • ArrogantAnalyst@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    AirVPN customer since 7-8 years. If you want some flashy highly polished website and client which could win design awards, look elsewhere. Otherwise it’s top notch. They have an easy to use client and support for both native WireGuard and OpenVPN.

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been using PIA. They changed owners awhile back and there were some concerns about if they would continue to NOT keep logs. They have maintained that standard and I’ve had zero issues torrenting with them.

    • anonymouslemmy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They sell even an antivirus, I don’t think it’s trustworthy company. In my personal opinion nowadays antivirus are a scam.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used PIA years ago and they supported OpenVPN and Wireguard so you should be able to configure them in gluetun with that, but I’ve only had one half-assed attempt at trying out containers at this point so take this with a grain of salt.

        • rambos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok ill keep that in mind ty. Was going to get free trial, but ill stick to airvpn for now since they are keeping PF it seems

  • Don Beefy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mullvad vpn is great. They offer different ways to pay so you can maintain privacy and you only pay for the amount of time you want.

    • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are people downvoting? Is there something wrong with Mullvad? As far as I was aware, it was one of the good one out there…

      • Don Beefy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because I responded before reading the body of the post. OP specifically asked for a VPN that is not Mullvad. I thought i deleted the reply, but I guess it is still visible.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mullvad just removed port forwarding so OP is looking for something new. I didn’t downvote though (jerboa doesn’t even show a downvote button).

    • pineapplelover@readit.buzz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They had a data breach because they weren’t careful and they’re a bunch of liars that say the government hasn’t sent data requests but they have.

      I’m a protonvpn unlimited subscriber and I love it because the company has lawyers to fight tooth and nail against legal requests I can’t say the same for Nord. The only controversy Proton has had is with Protonmail when an environmental activist used it and proton gave their IP address. There was lots of backlash from this but if you use the internet without a VPN (the activist did not use a VPN), then you should be expecting your IP address to be public, that’s how the internet is able to work.

      https://thevpn.guru/nordvpn-legal-data-request/https://www.pcmag.com/news/nordvpn-actually-we-do-comply-with-law-enforcement-data-requestshttps://techcrunch.com/2019/10/21/nordvpn-confirms-it-was-hacked/

      • nemanin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does protonvpn have an option to auto-connect to vpn on wifi networks (with white listing)?

        Apart form my transmission-openvpn container, my main use of the vpn is to keep my traffic private from my personal devices (iphone, ipad, mac) on most wifi networks. It just auto connects and I never have to remember to do it. But home/trusted wifi is white listed and won’t vpn, again automagically.

    • CheeseAndCrepes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honesty the reason I never considered them is because they advertised so hard on YouTube and Podcasts that they annoyed me so I never considered them.

      Jesus, felt like there was a time when halfway through any YouTube video it became “and I learned about this browsing the internet safely with Nord VPN…”

      • Mr_Bobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use NordVPN to play some Raid Shadow Legends while I cook up a delicious meal from HelloFresh.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t offer port forwarding so it’s kinda pointless to use for torrenting.

        • nemanin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Although reading another comment makes me think maybe I don’t understand this as well as I think I do…….

    • elghoto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least in the context of the question:

      1. they don’t have port forwarding. 2) their speeds for torrenting are crap.
    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are a great VPN. People hated them because it’s a fad to hate on the status quo, as well as their heavy and annoying advertising campaign.

      • elghoto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have had them. At least for torrenting they are crap. No port-forwarding and crappy speeds. I’m not using them now, and I’m very happy.

        Also to watch content from other regions from streaming services. All their servers were banned…

  • Oshka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I started with Cyberghost because they were cheap and had no issues. ProtonVPN my go to now though.

    • azron@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Port forwarding allows for a direct connection from one client to another. Effectively when a VPN let’s you port forward if you go to the external IP address they assign + the port they assigned they will be able to directly connect to a port that a program/service is listening on.

      Torrent sites are only telling your client who to connect to via the tracker, your client still needs to be able to connect to them. You can still download without this but it is generally slower (may be going through a relay) and you cannot seed torrents except for anyone that can directly connect to you on whatever VPN you are on.

      *Likely some mistakes above. Keep me honest denizens of the web.

    • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It forwarding opens a port direct to your system from the vpn ip.

      So if your internet address at your router to your ISP is 1.1.1.1(which NATs it to your PC address on your lan) and the vpn exit address is say 10.10.10.10

      Then when you port forward a port, say 443 (you wouldnt) then any request to 10.10.10:443 would then go to 1.1.1.1:443 and then to your pc on your lan.

      In short it allows a direct connection through the vpn

      Edit

      Technically that’s slightly incorrect,

      packet goes on 10.10.10.10:443 but it goes to the PC directly through the vpn tunnel. The port it goes through the 1.1.1.1 router to the PC on could be anything, it won’t necessarily be 443. It will be whatever the vpn is set to use

    • rambos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel like its kinda late to learn now lol. Jokes aside, but its hard to find a good vpn with port forwarding nowdays, I dont know is there any at all. Im not expert, but forwarding will help a lot with seeding and thats the point of torrenting

      Edit: you can still use torrents without port forwarding, it wont mess up your download speed

  • Roxxor@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Got a lifetime subscription for FastestVPN some years ago. Its slow, but it works and is unlimited so 🙆‍♂️

      • Roxxor@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its not for privacy, but for deniability. I wouldn’t “trust” any traditional VPN.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t trust them to keep me ‘hidden’ but I do trust the commercial VPNs not to snoop on my traffic or do other nefarious things. Something like this, I wouldn’t trust either way.