If not on Wayland, what’s stopping you?

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m on Wayland on all computers. The main pain point I have with Wayland at this moment is the lack of session save/restore (remembering which windows were open and saving their state on logout, and restoring all on login). All of the computers are powered by AMD graphics cards and KDE Plasma desktop.

    • blackberries33@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I did not know wayland was lacking this feature until recently when I switched to wayland on my work computer. So long as I know stuff won’t be restored, I can plan ahead now.

  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    X, because honestly my screen works and don’t currently need to replace the server behind it.

    • Bacteria@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand and X works fine for a lot od people but do remember the number of developers maintaining it have been dropping year on year. No harm in trying IMO. If you are on Plasma or Gnome, you get a simple switcher on the login screen.

      • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I know X is really showing its age.

        I have to add that the switcher is not on Debian 12 by default, where Wayland support for Plasma is optional in plasma-workspace-wayland. Also, it is broken on Nvidia due to missing packages/libraries and Nvidia’s proprietary driver still in general not supporting Wayland properly.

  • sporif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wayland on my ryzen laptop, Xorg on my Nvidia pc. There are just too many things missing with Nvidia, such as Gsync, gamma control, overclocking and fan control.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    X because when I try selecting Wayland from sddm the screen goes black and then takes me back to sddm. I’m on manjaro and I’ve done no configuration and I’ve not attempted to install Wayland I just assume because it’s an option in my drop down that it’s been installed.

  • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m using X because on Wayland windows sometimes disappear from view. I can’t even blame Nvidia because I’m all Intel.

  • Efwis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m on X atm. Wayland works, but it stops some configs from working properly. For example I have endeavour set up to not only notify me of updates, but I can click on the icon in the tray and it will start the update on X, where on Wayland the tray icon doesn’t show so I have to manually update my system. I like the simplistic click and go the tray icon offers me. This is just one feature I run into problems with. I don’t run NVIDIA so I don’t have the compatibility issue with that.

  • packetloss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Currently on X. Mostly because out of the box Wayland doesn’t work with my nVidia card. I know there are solutions available to make it work, but I haven’t had the time to try them, and honestly X is working just fine for me. Not sure what benefits I’d see by switching to Wayland.

  • thenextfrontier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use wayland on my laptop running GNOME, and I haven’t noticed anything out of the ordinary. I recognize that people’s hardware is a big deciding factor on if it works this well or not though…

    • Bacteria@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. I am myself running Plasma Wayland on 2 laptops (both Ryzen APUs) for over an year now. Seems like Nvidia is the biggest limiting factor.

  • I_like_cats@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Using Xfce on my laptop because it’s a piece of shit and wayland becomes unresponsive when ram is used up but X keeps working

  • JM@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still using X on some of my servers because AnyDesk does not currently support Wayland, and sometimes I want a GUI instead of ssh.

  • mori@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Wayland and love it, but have two serious issues:

    1. Sunshine does not show a mouse cursor without a hack that kills performance.
    2. Have to disable asyc reprojection in order to use VR.
      Bonus less serious issue: I can’t re-dock floating toolbars on X applications when using XWayland.
  • feyo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been on Wayland for a few years. It’s not always been sunshine and roses, but neither has X.

    I still remember being really annoyed everytime I had to edit Xorg.conf files and finding my desktop to no longer boot or mouse to no longer work.