• shane@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      In general you can’t claim copyright over something that someone else has made. That’s kind of the point.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Nope. So far the only country on earth that’s tabled laws to allow for this is Denmark.

          • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Bullshit. YouTube will takedown videos from 1A auditors. That’s why they don’t tell the disgruntled people their channels or identity.

            You just have to file a privacy claim. Then they have to blur or censor your face. Clown emoji are popular.

            • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It’s not bullshit.

              1. Denmark has passed a law allowing people to copyright their likeness and no other country has done so.

              2. Youtube isn’t a court and it’s TOS can be stricter than laws.

              3. Filming someone in public is fundamentally different than using AI to generate their likeness. As you identified, it’s usually a privacy issue, not a copyright one.

        • shane@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You can trademark it, but that doesn’t apply retroactively, and then you have to vigorously defend it or you will lose the trademark (which is why corporations are constant sending cease and desist letters to their own fan clubs).

      • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Ok, if they aren’t actually claiming that the video was released by Talarico, then explain to me how this isn’t slander?

        Publicly and falsely claiming someone said or did something that causes material damage is slander.

        • shane@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I think it is libel, since it is a video. (Historically if it was a lie spoken about someone then it was slander, and if it was a lie written about someone then it was libel. I think that a fake video is more like an intentionally false written piece.)

          In any case, collecting damages for lies told about is possible. I’m not sure it can be done in time for the election, and the people seeing it on TikTok probably won’t ever know about the case, so mission accomplished, I’m afraid.