• listener17@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If only the rules made any sense whatsoever and they were all checked (which they should be). Then we would actually know.

    What if Carlos and George would have failed as well? They just get promoted in the points because of “reasons”.

    I guess fair application of the rules is too much to ask.

    • DredUnicorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And what if 2 back markers failed and nobody cared. Random is about as fair as you can get. Just because it doesn’t seem fair doesn’t mean it wasn’t.

      • listener17@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Universally applying a rule by measuring all competitors shouldn’t be contentious.

        People baby the FIA too much. I am sure they can find a way to make it work–especially considering 50% of the cars they randomly tested failed.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much every Motorsport body does it this way iirc. Nascar doesn’t inspect every car after every race in excruciating detail, they just spot check anything they think could have been manipulated.