• OR3X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    If kids these days are anything like we were as kids being forced to do something will just result in that thing being mocked, derided, and never taken seriously… Outside of the already brainwashed kids, that is.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      easiest way to turn people away is to make em actually read that dumbshit themselves, there’s a reason priests pick and choose a couple snippets every week…

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Indeed, I had the benfit of agnostic parents and no forced church time, but I remember reading the bible a bit around 11-12 years old and thinking it was insane people believe that shit is real.

  • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    To be honest, my junior year English teacher forced us to read the bible “to have a stronger basis for understanding western literature” and it had zero impact on my lack of religious beliefs. Literally, we spent like 2 or 3 months on that crap. Looking back it was a pretty obvious scam by her, but it had zero impact in the direction that she wanted it to have impact.

    • Thetechloop
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      it would of been cooler if it was the Tao Te Ching that she forced you read. People like to bend the rules and force you to believe what they believe cause deep down they have a shallow faith. Their hug boxes makes them feel safe as it quells their existential dread.

      Use justice to rule a country. Use surprise to wage war. Use non-action to govern the world. How do I know it is so? As for the world, The more restrictions and prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be. The more sharp weapons people have in a country, The bigger the disorder will be. The more clever and cunning people are, The stranger the events will be. The more laws and commands there are, The more thieves and robbers there will be. Therefore the sage says: I do not act, And people become reformed by themselves. I am at peace, And people become fair by themselves. I do not interfere, And people become rich by themselves. I have no desire to desire, And people become like the uncarved wood by themselves. - Chapter 57 Tao Te Ching

    • degen@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I can get the cultural relevance, but between world history, the enlightenment, and American revolution, Christianity is basically covered in history class already. Not to mention the exposure from society at large.

      Like maybe have a religious studies elective if you’re really feeling it. Requirement is crazy though, and it’s not like reading the bible is about to convert any kids as you experienced.

      The more I think about it, I feel like meaningful study of anything biblical is past high school level to begin with.

      • Thetechloop
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I feel history is not linear. The points are illusions, there is a benefit to seeing people as they see themselves to hold them to account, the book of history never closes and no war ever ends. Happy anthropocene day!!!

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I doubt it. States have tried over and over again (both recently and in the past) to require the Bible, to require the 10 commandments, and on and on to no ultimate success. The Establishment Clause is clear, and this is more political theater from a Republican dominated government trying to gin up support for the midterms by creating a spectacle.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        And yet none of the attempts in the last decade have stuck. Same SCOTUS.

        This is just political theater.

    • ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s nothing in the constitution that prevents Bible Studies from being mandatory, it’s existed in the past.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes and no: the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prevents the government from overtly favoring one religion over another, so if they want Bible studies in public schools, they’ll have to equitably provide Catholics, Satanists, Muslims, Witches, Polytheists, etc. the same deference and inclusion in teaching materials as Protestant Christianity.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I was told there’s no better way to churn out atheists than to make them read from religious books. I hope it holds.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    I was already required to read Bible passages in Texas public high school. Got my only C in a English class because apparently my interpretation of David wasn’t up to snuff.