OddFed@feddit.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoGet the boatfeddit.deimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down146
arrow-up1262arrow-down1imageGet the boatfeddit.deOddFed@feddit.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoTo which authority? Because I know the milk conglomerate has been staunchly fighting for that very definition. The lack of consent is more viable as a disqualifier.
minus-squareTurun@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI think the main distinction is lactose. And/or the proteins that are present in milk. While oat milk and consorts can be used in a lot of use cases it’s not a one to one replacement and it’s dishonest to claim it is.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoDepends on the uses. Food Theory did a great video about this very thing, covering preferred taste, consistency, price, protein / fat content, and bake-ability: https://youtu.be/df8FRfVtVNw Lactose is simply the kind of sugar/ starch in the milk.
To which authority? Because I know the milk conglomerate has been staunchly fighting for that very definition.
The lack of consent is more viable as a disqualifier.
I think the main distinction is lactose. And/or the proteins that are present in milk.
While oat milk and consorts can be used in a lot of use cases it’s not a one to one replacement and it’s dishonest to claim it is.
Depends on the uses. Food Theory did a great video about this very thing, covering preferred taste, consistency, price, protein / fat content, and bake-ability: https://youtu.be/df8FRfVtVNw
Lactose is simply the kind of sugar/ starch in the milk.