• spauldo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure why that’s surprising. Raku started out as Perl 6. Perl was designed primarily for use in a shell environment. Convenience features like the arguments to MAIN bit are in line with Perl philosophy.

    • Oliver Lowe@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Agreed. I didn’t know about these features - I’ve never written any Perl before - and I do find them kinda interesting and cool. But not really surprising.

      A less clickbaity title might be “Exploring Raku’s built-in shortcuts for CLIs” or something. Still 6 words. And I still would have clicked and enjoyed the article! Really appreciated its positive tone and clear examples!

      • spauldo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I’ve got no complaints about the article or even its title. Few people learn Perl or Raku these days so it would be surprising for most people.

        I thought it was interesting myself - Perl’s my go-to scripting language but I never used Raku. I might consider it next time I have a non-trivial scripting project.

        • TechNom (nobody)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What makes Perl or Raku interesting? What are some applications where they are the ideal languages?

        • bnjmn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who picked up Raku without knowing anything about Perl (besides the fact that it had something to do with regex), it was a little surprising :)