In addition to the possible business threat, forcing OpenAI to identify its use of copyrighted data would expose the company to potential lawsuits. Generative AI systems like ChatGPT and DALL-E are trained using large amounts of data scraped from the web, much of it copyright protected. When companies disclose these data sources it leaves them open to legal challenges. OpenAI rival Stability AI, for example, is currently being sued by stock image maker Getty Images for using its copyrighted data to train its AI image generator.

Aaaaaand there it is. They don’t want to admit how much copyrighted materials they’ve been using.

  • bedrooms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The EU’s stance is concerning. Their coming laws would benefit unlawful AI devs backed by dictatorships. (Edit: They’ll do whatever they want to research and build more powerful AIs while devs in EU struggle due to heavy restrictions.) Currently, big techs are still learning how to build strong AIs, and giving dictatorships huge advantage like this is dangerous.

      • lasagna
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not to say this is on the EU but it and other governments need to shape the direction of AI rather than ban it. Banning Western or even slowing development in the West will just give evil governments like Russia and China an edge with the tech. Its potential for misuses are vast.