• ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They will need to respond much stronger than that, this claim is going to haunt their business forever.

    • recursive_recursion [they/them]A
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      based on the comments some say that they can’t sue but I would disagree

      If Tutanota is an unwilling participant than this violates the principles of consent, copyright, and penetration testing

      Tutanota lawyers might want to take a look as they might have a case.

      btw I AM NOT A LAWYER, please ask a real lawyer for legal advice
      again I AM NOT A LAWYER

      • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also a good thing to note that Canada doesn’t have the same concept of freedom of speech as the US has. Here you can be liable for damages caused by what you say.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically he didn’t say anything in a public forum tho. The article states he was briefed on the storefront by someone else, and seeing as it seems to fall under classified info it’s unlikely we will ever find out who that someone is.