Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoMore like guidelineslemmy.worldimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down118cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1461arrow-down1imageMore like guidelineslemmy.worldRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square34linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarelowleveldatalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years ago zero weight were easily observable how?
minus-squaretigeruppercut@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down1·2 years agoPeople looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
minus-squarelowleveldatalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 years ago conceive of the opposite Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
minus-square_danny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoHow much water, by weight, is in an empty cup? Round to the nearest amount an average 17th century merchant could identify.
minus-squareBillyTheSkidMark@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoI guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
how?
People looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
How much water, by weight, is in an empty cup? Round to the nearest amount an average 17th century merchant could identify.
I guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
Clouds.
Clouds