• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And less not-invented-here like.

    The only party playing that game is Canonical. Everybody else already agreed on Flatpak.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Flatpak cannot do what’s discussed in the article. Snap can and it was started prior to Flatpak. If Flatpak was able to do what Snap can, you’d have half a point.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Flatpak cannot do what’s discussed in the article.

        Nobody claimed 100% feature overlap. For regular GUI applications both work relatively similar, to the point that Snap now happily uses technologies developed for Flatpak, such as Portals.

        it was started prior to Flatpak.

        That’s irrelevant. One could just as well argue that Flatpak evolved from developments (OSTree, etc.) that are even older but that beside the point. Fact is that OSTree and Flatpak are vendor neutral and Snap isn’t. Attempts at vendor lock-in caused Valve leave Ubuntu and later choose Flatpak on SteamOS.