• David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a few steps from one to the other, but it keeps holding true in practice. Science fiction is a fundamentally colonial genre for the most part.

    • fnix@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got introduced to the genre through Star Trek and I always found its moral vision, in addition to all the weekly alien weirdness & how it was approached with patient curiosity, strongly appealing. Roddenberry set out to create an explicit alternative to the impoverished perspectives of the Cold War era. The Prime Directive is non-interventionist to a fault.

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotta have to push back on that. Certain genres are, but even the ones that are written nowadays and explicitely in the space opera genre tend to try to grapple with the ethics of colonialism.

      Greg Bear’s Hull Zero Three is set aboard a colony starship that’s revealed to be chock-full of genocidal weapons to ensure that the target planet isn’t a problem for humans to settle on. “Are we the monsters” etc.

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        sure, but even that’s a reaction inside the genre to the genre being steeped in it

        look at The Culture, Banks was a straight up communist writing about somewhere he’d want to live but the stories are about liberal colonisation