The incendiary text was removed from the website of The Guardian after becoming a top-trending link

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s an archived version:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20230920132832/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver

    He raises some fair points about the shitty things the US has done in the Middle East and our continued unwavering support of Israel. But we can’t just Ctrl-Z 80 years of history and ignore that State of Israel now exists and will have to coexist with Palestine. He lost me when he started whining that no one would let him implement Shariah law.

    The rest of it is tired antisemitic conspiracies along with calling on the US to convert to Islam and enshrine Shariah law into the Constitution. Thanks but no thanks: we already have enough religious nutjobs trying to turn the country into a theocracy and we don’t need more.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      His cognitive dissonance is impressive. He calls for the murdering of American civilians, then a few paragraphs later demands that we convert to his religion since it preaches peace and mercy.

    • jwt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Excellent summation, I’d subscribe to you reviewing dead terrorists’ letters.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In essence, he declares the US to be an enemy because of their support for Israel.

      That’s why this letter became viral now. That’s why you see people trying to downplay its significance.

      • dumdum666@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He also explained why it was ok in his opinion to attack and kill civilians: because the citizens of the US voted for their government and therefore it’s policies… by that standard it would be completely ok if Israel started killing civilians ON PURPOSE because Hamas is Gaza‘s government.

        • interceder270@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ok?

          by that standard it would be completely ok if Israel started killing ON PURPOSE because Hamas is Gaza‘s government.

          I mean, it’s the same rational any side uses to justify killing civilians. “They’re all the enemy.”

          Hamas did it.

          Israel is doing it.

          The US has done it.

          • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Rationalizing collateral damage is not the same as intending to cause mass death without distinction.

            If the US or Israel’s goal was maximizing death, the numbers would be astronomically higher.

            It is false equivalence.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bunch of religious nutjob shit plus his greatest hits. I think it went viral because he described the relationship of the US, Israel and Palestine amidst the nutjob shit.

      But as a wise man once said: you do not, under any circumstances, gotta give it to Al Qaeda

  • GARlactic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the actual fuck? People can’t possibly think his word is worth anything more than sewage.