• astraeus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t even aggressive, they’re literally showing they won’t work for the company if the company isn’t willing to work for them. All the unions in the US have to play politics with the government and corporations in order to keep things flowing smoothly, one false move and the corporations have the upper hand. With that kind of advantage, it’s the corporations who are aggressive here.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll never understand how the railroad workers union was only allowed to strike on a specific day for a specific time and then were forced to go back to work. Apparently they are labeled “critical” for the nation and then can’t strike??

      Like, uh, that’s literally the point of the strike. Highlighting how critical they are and that you should give them the meager asks they wanted. If some low-wage earners can shut down the entire country because they are upset about earning peanuts - well then maybe it shows they shouldn’t be earning peanuts.

      • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just watched on tv a documentary about strikes a hundred years ago in the US. Facing the Rockefellers, Carnegies and alike. Police was shooting them down. That’s the US. Railroaders are on strike just today in Germany.

        • drcobaltjedi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, theres shit like the battle of blair mountain that everyone should look into.

          Hey, my fellow 'Muricans, we actually took up arms here for our right to have a living wage