• I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You see an old man with 7 canaries

    WE ATTACK HIM LOL

    The DM doesn’t need to trick the players into attacking if that’s exactly what is expected of them. This is no different from a trap in a dungeon. If the players’ first reaction to anything is killing and looting (and the game wasn’t about that from the get go), it’s a valid reminder that they better watch out for consequences.

    • Susaga@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      “We attack this random old man!”
      “Gotcha! It was a Dragon God in disguise!”

      You see how it’s a trick? You see the deception?

      If you live in a high-crime area and put a shotgun trap behind your door, then you are guilty for the murder of anyone who dies trying to break into your house. Should they have tried to break into your house? No. Should you have killed them? Also no. You’re not in the right just because they’re in the wrong. It doesn’t work that way.

      Why is throwing Bahamut at the players knowing they’ll pick a fight with him a better solution than just talking to them?

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just in case this wasn’t clear, we’re talking about a meme. There’s no “full context” behind it, it’s a quick setup for a laugh. You can’t expect to take the meme at face value, that the party became muderhobo out of nowhere and that bahamut also comes out of nowhere because the DM is a bitch.

        In a real situation, the more likely thing to happen is that the many other things the DM threw to get the players back in line failed, so it’s time to bring the big guns. It’s likely that the group had a talk out of the game discussing their situation and their possible future. Likely being the keyword here because, again, you’re assuming that this comes out of nowhere, but there’s no “real” table being discussed

        Why is throwing Bahamut at the players knowing they’ll pick a fight with him a better solution than just talking to them?

        Because it gives the players an opportunity to acknowledge that in game.

        TLDR - you’re missing the point because you’re assuming a lot of stuff that isn’t even hinted at anywhere.

        • Susaga@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You assumed my assumption, but it honestly doesn’t matter if it came out of nowhere or not. Step one is talking to the players like adults about the problem. Step two is removing a player from the game, possibly yourself. There is never enough buildup to justify introducing an OP enemy to guaranteed kill your players as a punishment. Even if there was, you should have left the game long before that point, and should leave the game now instead of firing that big gun.

          Why do players need to acknowledge it in game? That’s not where the problem is. The problem is among the players, not the characters. You don’t solve OOC problems within the game.

          I don’t think I’m the one assuming a lot of stuff and missing the point here.

          • I Cast Fist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think I’m the one assuming a lot of stuff

            Nobody said “hey, maybe turn down the murdurhoboing?”, they chose to trick the players into attacking a god.

            2 assumptions here, one that “nobody said…” and also one that the DM “chose to trick the players”.

            More importantly, there’s your implicit assumption that a chaotic murderhobo party facing bahamut in disguise can only be the result of “things going wrong”, that “someone” is making the experience bad for the DM. This is pretty clear from this bit:

            Step two is removing a player from the game, possibly yourself

            And how you’re replying elsewhere: “if it’s bad, just leave”. To reach such conclusion you have to assume that:

            • “something is going wrong”
            • nobody talked about it out of the game
            • nobody did anything else to try avoiding the “wrong” situation
            • there were zero “warnings” (nothing else happening in game could be said to be a hint of escalation of a problem to godly level)
            • all players are completely oblivious to any traps or tricks the DM could set up
            • setting up bahamut in disguise like is meant solely to kill the characters, ignoring the many different possibilities as to why he could show up (“teach a lesson”, give a warning, setup for plot)

            There is never enough buildup to justify introducing an OP enemy to guaranteed kill your players as a punishment. Even if there was, you should have left the game long before that point, and should leave the game now instead of firing that big gun.

            Just because you cannot think of an escalation that leads to a god showing up in a game doesn’t mean that nobody else can. Just because you can only see this setup as “rock falls, everyone dies” doesn’t mean that everybody else will use it exactly for that.

            • Susaga@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              What the hell is the meme you’re looking at? In the meme I see, the DM is annoyed by the current environment of murderhoboing and responds by introducing a Bahomet in a way where the players clearly don’t know who he is and haven’t met him before. The DM chose to add him, just like they chose every element of the campaign thus far and they chose to continue playing among murderhobos. The only reason Bahomet was included was as a punishment, and it’s fucking baffling you insist that’s not what’s happening.

              I can think of several reasons to have a god show up in a game. I can only think of one reason to respond to the players being murderhobos by introducing a god in an innocent disguise and saying “try it, bitch”. What do you think is the point of the meme if not “the players are being murderhobos, so I’m going to punish them by making them pick a fight with a god”?

              • ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, the party all snapped at the same time and started murder hoboing and it definitely wasn’t talked about before hand by the party or the dm.

                Listen, it sounds like you’ve been traumatized by some passive aggressive dm. I cannot think of a reason you’re so passionate about this.

                It really feels like you’d be a part of the “doms don’t need aftercare” crowd too.

                One of the closer examples of this actually happening is a party was underneath an alchemist shop in the sewers which I said smelled of sulphur. The newest person to the party their first move down there was fireball. I literally said “are you sure?” While giving him the look. Anyways most people made their dex saves and it was a lesson in fuck around find out. They became a great player and meshed really well with the game. But saying something and doing something are two different things. I told them before this event I will reward them for being smart and punish for not being observant. You need this ability to do things like this in game in order to smoothly, without breaking the flow, push the players in the right direction.

                You don’t have to be in that style of game, you also have the ability to ask the DM how they want to run the game.

                There are games out there for any type of player and dm. If you think it’s the dm’s JOB to make you happy then I do not want to be a part of any game you’re in. This is a group game.

                • Susaga@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Holy fuck, are you not paying attention? It does not matter if it was sudden or not. If it got to the point that the DM was willing to twist the narrative to kill the entire party, they should have already left.

                  I haven’t been traumatised. Heck, I’ve barely ever been a player. I just don’t know why people are being so defensive of vindictive DMing. It’s deeply unhealthy. Doms do need aftercare, but they also shouldn’t go into their fun with spite on their mind.

                  Your example is NOT an example, because that player was not murderhoboing. You weren’t vindictively adding an element to the game to get him killed, you were organically reacting to their actions with details that had already been established. Your consequence made sense, and it made the game more fun for everyone involved.

                  It is a DM’s job to make sure everyone had fun at the end of the session, DM included. Technically, that’s everyone’s job, but the DM is the one with more authority. This doesn’t mean bad things can’t happen, but nobody should be outright miserable. If one person’s fun would detract from someone else’s fun, then either a frank conversation is needed or someone should leave to find that fun elsewhere.

                  • ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If it got to the point that the party was willing to twist the narrative to kill the entire campaign, they should have already left.

                    Then why are you so passionate about this if you don’t have experience? I have experience both as a player when another player goes all murder hobo, and a GM when people have gone full murder hobo. It isn’t fun, there was always talk before hand and the GM tries to not break flow of game. I’m not “defense of vindictive DMing” I’ve just been in plenty of complex situations similar to A NINETEEN WORD MEME that you are refusing to understand that people with experience are laughing at, not because “being mean is good” but people trying to make the best of a shit situation they’ve been PUT in.

                    It’s a perfect example of what I have been talking about.

                    DM explains expectations
                    Player ignores everything
                    DM does in game thing to enforce expectations

                    My experience is definitely people wanting to play/GM with friends and I haven’t ever directly paid/been pain for sessions. So when I say job I’m definitely implying a soul crushing 9-5 and not a session between friends. It’s a group activity, everyone should be trying. If it is solely the DM’s job to keep the peace, it is a failing game.