UnitedHealthcare accused of using AI that denies critical medical care coverage | (Allegedly) putting profit before patients? What a shock.::undefined

  • Kalkaline
    link
    fedilink
    English
    297 months ago

    United can suck my balls, they denied an ADHD med I’ve been on for years.

    • LazaroFilm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      My doc tried to change my ADHD meds to another one with less side effects. Denied and told him to try another one. T felt completely inebriated all day and fell asleep at the dinner table. At this point I give up. I’ll just deal with ADHD. It’s better than dealing with fixking health insurance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The full source code of that “AI:”

    function process_claim (claim_id){

    return "denied";

    }

  • andyburke
    link
    fedilink
    247 months ago

    People with no moral compass are selling “AI” to credulous hospital administrators trying to maximize their bonuses by cutting healthcare worker hours.

    Fuck for-profit healthcare.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    UnitedHealthcare, is being sued over claims it is using a flawed AI model. The system is said to have wrongfully denied health coverage to critical elderly patients and disagreed with doctors’ determinations.

    The lawsuit followed an investigation by Stat News about the use of an AI algorithm called nH Predict developed by Navihealth. The algorithm is used to anticipate how long patients will stay in rehab following acute injuries, illness, or events. Post-acute care includes the likes of nursing homes and rehab centers. The algorithm reportedly does this by examining a database of medical cases from 6 million patients and estimating a patients’ medical requirements and length of stay.

    The lawsuit alleges that the AI system has a 90% error rate and overruled the post-acute care opinions of physicians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      277 months ago

      The fact that insurance companies don’t have to defer to physicians for medical decisions is mind boggling.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 months ago

        Their excuse is that they aren’t “overruling the doctor”, they just aren’t going to pay for it. Never mind that in the US it’s functionally the same thing.

        They will just say “you do what you think is best for the patient doc. We just disagree and aren’t going to cover it.” It forces doctors, hospitals, rehabs, and nursing homes into situations where they either have to provide care for free, or not at all. I’ll never understand how we allowed things to get this bad.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      US healthcare on February 29th:

  • @namingthingsiseasy
    link
    English
    77 months ago

    Same shit, different day. Companies love denying people basic needs and then blaming it on “the computer” (to borrow a '90s parlance). They love it because you can’t blame a person, rather you can just say it’s some inherent fault of the universe rather than some trash executive’s decision to let people die in the name of profits. When their profits are in danger, the universe can be bent to anyone’s will to save them; when their profits are rosy, well, chaotic universe theory, what are you gonna do? :shrug:

    The whole “AI” aspect of it is nothing new. “AI” is just regular software with different (and highly non-deterministic) algorithms running under the hood. Can’t wait till this stupid term is relegated to the dustbin of history.

    • @nous
      link
      English
      97 months ago

      Yes. It is can I spin this as AI to investors?

      I admit, not a very high bar to pass so basically everything is labeled as AI these days. It is what investors want to see.

    • FlumPHP
      link
      English
      37 months ago

      Nope. It’s fully a marketing term and always has been. Worked at a firm that used a very, very basic bit of machine learning. But you better believe our marketing and investor pitch decks said “AI” a ton.