• DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They are, yet less than 2% of accusations are actually false, so piss off with the “only accusations” bullshit as if it isn’t at least a massive red banner of a flag.

    • sederx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So he wasn’t convicted.

      Innocent until proven guilty bud.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Innocent until proven guilty bud.

        That means the government shouldn’t just start throwing everyone in jail at the first accusation. That doesn’t mean the public can’t or shouldn’t act on the information.

        • sederx
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The information that nobody has proven in a court of law? That’s for barbarians

          • kirklennon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do realize that people also have the right of free association? The government needs to meet a very high standard before it can deprive someone of life, liberty, or property. Members of the public may refuse to do business with a person, or socially ostracize them, based on whatever information they have available.

            • sederx
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure but then don’t pretend there is anything righteous about it, it’s just rumours until proven.