• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    When they ask you about cookies and you can “accept all” in one click, but if you want to reject all that aren’t strictly necessary you have to navigate to a different page

    • radix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, this should be illegal. I predict California and/or the EU will get rid of it soonish (within the next 10 years maybe? not the most experienced forecaster).

      • BlessedDog@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is IIRC. In the eu I think its mandatory that declining cookies is as easy as accepting.

        • Hauke@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is better but still sucks. The whole thing is flawed from the ground up: In order to remember you opted out of cookies, it is necessary to store a cookie in your browser. Cookies should be op-in but I think it’s obvious this is not gonna happen

          • Ghoelian@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pretty sure a cookie like that would fall under strictly necessary, so you’re still allowed to save it without consent.

        • radix@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it mandates a Do Not Sell My Personal Information toggle, as I understand it.

          • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Which usually requires an email address, in my experience, so it’s really only worth doing that if you already have an account at that site.