Features

  • Support multiple shells: bash/zsh/powershell/fish/nushell/elvish/xonsh
  • Support multiple platforms: windows/macOS/linux
  • Built-in completions for 1000+ commands (full list)
  • Automatically generate completion script from help-text/man-page
  • Lazy completing, lower memory consumption and faster startup time
  • NixDev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have you used this? Is there any benefits over bash-completion?

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve not used it yet, but I found bash-completion to be lacking quite often. Completion is one reason I’m using fish atm.

      But from the looks of it it’s exactly what bash/zsh is missing for me.

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve used zsh for it’s support for posix sh and have my config. But I find fish to be faster with the features I want and it has those features ootb.

          Maybe I’ll give zsh another try.