Republican lawmakers in the US are leaning into outdated definitions of obscenity to outlaw drag and ban books too

For five months this year, homosexuality was prohibited in a Tennessee college town.

In June, the city council of Murfreesboro enacted an ordinance outlawing “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct”. The rule did not explicitly mention homosexuality, but LGBTQ+ people in the town quickly realized that the ordinance references 21-72 of the city code, which categorizes homosexuality as an act of indecent sexual conduct.

The ordinance was essentially a covert ban on LGBTQ+ existence.

Erin Reed, one of the first and only national journalists to cover the ordinance earlier this year, noted that Murfreesboro isn’t “the only community that has these old archaic bits of code that target homosexuality”.

Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list of acts defined as “public indecency” by the city code. The small victory came after officials repeatedly refused to issue permits for the BoroPride Festival, citing the new ordinance.

    • Dem Bosain
      link
      fedilink
      English
      50
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “After prayerful thought and talking with my family, I have decided not to run for re-election…"

      WTF, why do these people always blame God when they get caught? God wasn’t responsible for your own shady shit, and he’s not responsible for you cuttin’-and-runnin’.

  • YeetPics
    link
    fedilink
    357 months ago

    A bit redundant to say “archaic” and “Tennessee” isn’t it?

  • @Supermariofan67
    link
    297 months ago

    Obscenity law needs to be eliminated entirely at this point. It’s archaic entirely. Luckily, convicting under the Miller test is rare since pretty much everything has “serious artistic or political value”, but these laws shouldn’t be on the books at all. Needless violation of the first amendment to punish victimless crimes.

  • Metype
    link
    fedilink
    English
    177 months ago

    I lived scarily close to Murfreesboro to be reading this. Luckily I moved out of Tennessee back in August, and I hope my friends can get outta there soon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      I lived in Cookeville for a few years, glad I got the fuck outta TN, especially Cookeville. So many racists and homophobes there.

      • Metype
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        Yeah I went to TN Tech for a year so I know Cookeville :/

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 months ago

      Just once I wished I could snap my fingers for a role reversal for all these fucking asshole bigots. They probably still wouldn’t learn anything but I at least would feel a little better for a while.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        117 months ago

        No they actively believe they are reversing roles. They think that their religion is oppressed for people like me being allowed to show our faces in public and for them to be legally mandated to treat us like people.

        I don’t want revenge, I just want them to stop hurting people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          57 months ago

          I don’t want revenge either. More like forced empathy and perspective since they are usually incapable of experiencing either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          Yeah, if you get arrested for bullshit, it’s not like you un-miss work or get compensated for the lawyer you nerd to provide you got arrested for bukkshit.

    • girlfreddy
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      The ordinance states that the community “has the right to establish and preserve contemporary community standards.”

      I have to wonder if the “community” (and I use that term loosely) enacted pro-abortion rules/laws in '73 when Roe was passed so, you know, they kept up with contemporary standards.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wasn’t this whole thing debunked as an obscure definition that was never enforced, and was changed weeks before a story about it ever made headlines?

    Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list

    Yep.

    I’m cancelling my monthly donation to the guardian lmao. Ragebaiting like some fox news opinion piece.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      Part of the authoritarian playbook is selective enforcement.

      So it’s still scary, even if it never got used.

    • Heresy_generator
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In June, the city council of Murfreesboro enacted an ordinance outlawing “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct”. The rule did not explicitly mention homosexuality, but LGBTQ+ people in the town quickly realized that the ordinance references 21-72 of the city code, which categorizes homosexuality as an act of indecent sexual conduct.

      Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list of acts defined as “public indecency” by the city code. The small victory came after officials repeatedly refused to issue permits for the BoroPride Festival, citing the new ordinance.

      So the city was using the ordinance to shut down a pride festival based on the new ordinance’s reference to 21-72 of the city code until the ACLU got involved and they backed down rather than pay for lawyers to fight a battle they knew they couldn’t win in the courts.

      Murfreesboro made public homosexuality illegal and was enforcing it until the ACLU slapped them around. How is that “debunked”? You don’t think it’s newsworthy that a city government outlawed public homosexuality just because they rescinded it when challenged?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        https://www.facebook.com/boropridetn this is the pride organisers page. On the 2019 event listing they state it is the 4th annual event. They’ve been running pride events in the town every year for nearly a decade. The event occurred again this year, making it the 9th consecutive year.

        I don’t see gays being oppressed, I see dumb small town officials thinking they can make weird laws that would never hold up in court and getting immediately corrected.

        It’s more shocking to me that there was apparently no law that referenced that definition of “sexual conduct” until now that would have highlighted this bigoted part of the city code thats been there for years.

        Was fucking in the street legal? Why is it only on the 9th year of the event that they are getting push back? How many officials were involved in this law passing? Questions the guardian isn’t looking at because they don’t give a fuck, or the answers aren’t ragebait enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      It’s the fact that it had to be removed… And that there are plenty of people in government, including the speaker of the house, who actually want it to be illegal to be gay.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    57 months ago

    I feel like would be a great town to fuck in the park at midnight. Just more exciting because you could get a small ticket for it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      327 months ago

      Uncertain if it’ll be a small ticket from a police officer. I’m more confident it’ll be a burning cross and a noose from a group of white hooded individuals. There’s a history.