hardypart@feddit.de to pics@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comimagemessage-square337fedilinkarrow-up11.88Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.85Karrow-down1imageThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comhardypart@feddit.de to pics@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square337fedilink
minus-squareZpiritual@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·edit-21 year agoA surprising number of films are still shot on film and then transfered to a digital intermediate for editing and later distribution. Not only the few film imax ones. I wonder if anyone is still doing their editing on film, I highly doubt it.
minus-squareatempuser23@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoEditing is done on the computer, then the editing software outputs a list of foot and frames numbers that are hand ,machine,cut together.
minus-squareZpiritual@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI never thought of that as a possibility. Best of both worlds then I guess.
minus-squaremagnolia_mayhem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOr worst. I don’t know enough about editing to say.
A surprising number of films are still shot on film and then transfered to a digital intermediate for editing and later distribution. Not only the few film imax ones. I wonder if anyone is still doing their editing on film, I highly doubt it.
Editing is done on the computer, then the editing software outputs a list of foot and frames numbers that are hand ,machine,cut together.
I never thought of that as a possibility. Best of both worlds then I guess.
Or worst. I don’t know enough about editing to say.