Since on most fediverse instances you don’t automatically upvote your own comment, do you do it manually? What’s considered “proper etiquette”? Because on Reddit your stuff is self-upvoted automatically, while in YT comment sections comments with 1 like sometimes get called out for liking their own comment. Do we have an established standard here yet, and if not what are your thoughts on it?
Welcome to Kbin where everything is made up and the points don’t matter (except to everyone in this comment section apparently).
sigh
Take my meaningless vote. You’ve earned it!
hey! I live for upvotes! they’re the only thing i have in my life /s
No, I have people to do that for me.
Check your privilege, some of us can’t afford having others upvote our comments, we have to upvote our own smh
deleted by creator
I upvote everything I post. If I didn’t like it, I wouldn’t have submitted it.
That’s a good point.
Agreed. I also boost, as it adds visibility on instances that look at those and not upvotes.
Plus, boosting and upvoting create indexes for me to easily access my content later via my profile (boosts show up under the boosts tab, upvotes show up under favorites).
I also try to upvote and boost a fair number of the comments that reply to my threads as appreciation for the contribution.
If its wrong to upvote own posts, then it should be disabled.
If there are different policies re auto own voting then over time users from instances which do it will end up with higher scores over time. all else being equal.
Upvoting your own material is a Michael Scott thing to do.
Some people may be superstitious about leaving it at zero. Since I’m only a little stitious I leave it alone. :)
That’s why kbin should self-upvote by default. If only Michael Scotts are upvoting their own comments, then the Michael Scotts have an inherent advantage in comment visibility.
We’re going to hear more from the Michael Scotts and less from the humble Pams.
Exactly. Until then, upvote yourself!
too lazy
No, it’s kind of weird we can upvote our own stuff anyway. We wouldn’t submit it if we didn’t support what we were saying anyway.
See, I always thought that felt really weird when Reddit did it, I never liked that. To me, if a post has zero up votes, that should mean either no one has seen it yet or that everyone who has feels entirely neutral about it, it’s right at 0. If there’s at least 1 upvote, that should mean at least 1 person found it good, and if it’s negative, at least 1 person thinks it isn’t. To start that total at 1 instead of 0 feels arbitrary and like designed to be less intuitive, not more.
Like someone said above (but making the opposite point from them here), if you didn’t like it, why would you post it? You having posted or commented at all is evidence you meant to, have you ever commented or posted by accident? There’s intentionality there by default, I don’t see why it needs the auto self-upvote to start with.
