A: 15 years B: 20 years C: 25 years D: 30 years E: 40 years F: 50 years G: other

  • astraeus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m almost afraid to answer this question.

    The rock from the 60s and 70s got ubiquitously considered classic rock by the early 90s, but I wouldn’t classify anything beyond the early 80s as “classic”. I think that the genre may expand with time, but the 60s and 70s were the true origins of rock. The music past that is definitely not new, but not “classic”.

    I guess that makes my answer G.

    Edit: From a marketing perspective, I’m about to cringe hard, music up to the mid-90s is considered classic rock. To me that seems like it’s just an easy way to keep “classic rock” more entertaining and nostalgic for the older markets, and more relevant for the younger ones.

    • Devi@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hear bands like Linkin Park referred to as classic rock quite a bit and that’s early 2000’s. I cringe every time someone says it.

      • averyminya@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is is that they’re not quite wrong.

        It’s not quite right, but it will only become more true.

    • GeekyOnion@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a great point that it’s more of a era or genera than a designator to be applied as the work ages. You have Rockabilly, Classic Rock, Grunge Rock, etc.

      One of the things that makes music slightly different than durable goods, although I would have a hard time calling anything from the 90’s “vintage,” but it’s getting close to that age.