I am ashamed that I hadn’t reasoned this through given all the rubbish digital services have pulled with “purchases” being lies.

  • floppade [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That is an assumption made that the artist still has the original thing that was not paid for. I understand what you’re being pedantic about. I just don’t think you’re right.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      What part of that statement suggests that the artist no longer has the original art? As stated, no theft occurred.