Windows 10 gets three more years of security updates, if you can afford them::Windows 10 gets a version of the program that extended updates for Windows 7.

  • SpicyLizards@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Paid updates may as well be no updates. Give us privacy or cost.

    Of course Linux is the only way

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re the contrarian that likes corporate so much. Didn’t think i will see your comment here.

        Edit: It’s actually fitting that you would show up here.

        • XEAL@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I recognize that fantastic username. Just… avoid the guy.

          I had an unrelated encounter with him/her/they/it/whatever a couple of weeks ago. Troll or not, the guy tends to be a dick about everything.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            I disagree with the user base. I’m a dick. Got it. Can you point out where I have dune anything but express my opinion?

            • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Bruv. You have a -16341 and decreasing total user score.
              Clearly you’re quite abrasive to have a score like that.
              Not to mention that you have about 15.2333… comments per day on average which seems pretty damn obsessive to me.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                It seems reductive to go back to Reddit insults. “You have low karma and spend too much time on the platform.” Cmon.

                15 comments a day is nothing, that’s an hour of active engagement, a day.

                • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The -16k is much more telling though. Nobody gets the low without intentionally being a dick.

                • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  15 comments a day (key word) on average.
                  He’s had the account for 2 months and already has 915 comments.
                  I’ve had my account for 6 months, am active nearly every day and barely have half that.
                  He’s turned this into his personal messenger and most of it is him spewing vomit in text form.

        • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I don’t even bother engaging anymore. It’s a troll account. Downvote, ignore, and move on.

          • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agreed. You have shown us you are very close to average. Just a tiny bit more intellect and you’ll make it there! God speed, superstar.

          • eskimofry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then why are you in all your arguments I have seen you; defaulting to the position that things you pay for are “always” better than things that are “free”? Many would agree to the position that things we pay for are “usually” better than things that are free.

            It’s true that paying gives you better quality… but NOT ALWAYS.

            • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because that’s the average user. If the average user defaulted to setting up next cloud then Google wouldn’t be worth a trillion dollars. There are conflations with the average lemmy user and an actual average user.

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Extension updates compatibility and stability, video card driver issues, poor inconsistent audio source management tools, general challenges getting 1-1 level of functionality with touch pads and webcams (spending days trying to figure out why xdotool isn’t working only to find you now need ydotool for Wayland was fun).

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Extension updates compatibility and stability

            Then stop using GNOME, lol. ◉⁠‿⁠◉

            poor inconsistent audio source management tools

            Elaborate, because I haven’t had any issues with PipeWire.

          • eskimofry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You should stick to a stable disto. It feels like you are exploring installing packages on your own instead of using a distribution like PopOS or Linux Mint

    • DarkMatterStyx @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I upgraded my Surface Pro 3’s to Kubuntu just this week. Should have done it ages ago. They run faster and cooler now.

          • Red_October@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is literally a discussion about operating systems, and how Windows is about to do something that will directly push people into needing or choosing a new one. Even without Lemmy’s culture this is an obvious time to mention Linux. You can bitch and cry and screech all you want, but you’re the one getting your panties in a bunch when Linux is literally on topic here.

              • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except thats not how discussions work.

                People dont JUST strictly talk about the thing at hand and ONLY that. They bring up related things as well. Like Linux and how its an alternative to Windows 10 once it’s support period is up.

                Kind of like how someone might bring up the SNES in a discussion about the PS5 to make some kind of relevant point. Like how far consoles have come from the SNES to the PS5 or a game library comparison. Or something.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If there’s something stupid that Apple does, people will talk about using Windows or Android instead. You’re the weird one for getting angry about something that’s completely expected.

              • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Look, if you can’t handle that people here like Linux, you’re probably better off just leaving the site altogether and going to somewhere like Reddit. Lemmy is FOSS, which is the main ethos behind Linux.

                You’re like the kid who goes into a McDonalds and then complains that they don’t serve fois gras there. What the fuck did you expect? It’s a fucking McDonald’s. They’re not gonna have that shit there.

                Also, it would help you out in your future if you understood the difference between people liking something and talking about it on their own with others and “shoving it down your throat”.

  • trackindakraken@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been with Windows forever, since version 3. I’m old.

    These past few months I’ve been trying Ubuntu, and it’s fine for everyday use, browsing and file management. And, LibreOffice has been my office suite for years, so no problem there–I don’t demand much from that.

    But, graphics applications are barely there. Blender is fine. Inkscape is so-so, but I just discovered recently that it doesn’t keep track of object rotation, so there is no simple way to set the rotation back to zero. Corel Draw gave up Linux support years ago, or that would be my go-to. I haven’t tried LibreDraw yet, but I don’t have much hope for it. Gimp is, eh.

    I haven’t tried playing FO4 or Starfield yet, though. I’ve just been switching back to Windows for that.

    I don’t mind using Terminal, it reminds me of MS-DOS days, but I don’t see myself ever become proficient at it.

    I won’t be getting Windows 11, I’ve decided that. But I see that I’ll likely need to give up a lot to make that stand.

    • alonely0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You might enjoy more Fedora KDE or Linux Mint.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows 10 LTSC IoT + a certain mass grave script or whatever has got you covered until 2032.

  • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why are people making a huge deal out of this? Win10 was released in 2015, and support ends in 2025. That’s 10 years of support, I don’t think this is unreasonable for a consumer product by any means.

    As far as industry goes it’s a bit short, but nothing catastrophic. There’s plenty of xp machines still running just fine in many places. Lack of security updates is less crucial for most of these applications since they’re often not required to be connected to internet.

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t upgrade to Windows 11 (not that I’d want to considering all their enshittification), so they’re leaving me with an unsecured OS. I survive on £160 a month so, no, I won’t be paying for fucking security updates, instead I’ll be switching to Linux and literally never considering using Windows again.

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s also not reasonable to expect updates forever. No matter what, support for software always stops at some point, and 10 years of support is pretty reasonable for consumer products. Not great, but also not terrible.

        • Bongles@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Normally sure, but maybe Microsoft shouldn’t have tried saying windows 10 was the last windows version, to then release a new version that a lot of people can’t even upgrade their current PCs to.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But consider that windows is a paid product, and its competition, linux, is both free and with much much longer support for old hardware, not to mention never having “sequels” in this way. I feel like windows doesn’t have much excuse compared to this.

            • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Windows 11, while you can work around it, specifically requests tpm, which definitively is not from 1999…

              Also, windows has its own endless list of driver issues, hardware does not always “just work” on windows, on the other hand, it also often “just works” on linux. It depends, of course, but I never had to install a sketchy driver for my PS3 controller on linux (it’s in the kernel), but I had to on windows. Not to mention printers.

              A bunch of software is also only or primarily for Linux, though that depends of course on your field and what you need. I’ve seen plenty of software that I needed that did not have a proper (or as good) windows alternative.

              • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I mean, TPM 2.0 is already 4 years old so were not really talking about MS requiring cutting-edge tech when they stop supporting Win10 in two years.

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not like this is something that’s right around the corner, it’s nearly two years down the road from now. If you already have old hardware that doesn’t meet specs, then that will be even more deprecated in two years.

        Its the same circus every time a windows OS goes EOL, people loose their shit for no reason and then move on.

        • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          But not any less usable.
          I tried Windows 11 on Compal FL90, a 16 year old laptop. It ran fine, better than Windows 10. But it didn’t meet the requirements to allow installation, even though it worked just fine. So some 5 year old computer that doesn’t meet requirements for whatever reason would also be just fine. And I don’t think people will bother with making hybrid installer just to get Windows 11 running.

          Just for fun, this is how fast it could boot up with Windows 8.1:

          Link for compatibility

          8.1 actually outperformed both Windows XP and Windows Vista this laptop was made for.

          Anyway, even with Windows 11, it was still pretty fast. I didn’t try any better games, but Asphalt 8 and Asphalt 9 ran on it nicely. It’s just to say that old computer doesn’t mean it’s garbage.

          • yggdar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That may be true for the exact hardware you used, and the exact tests you have done. For Microsoft the problem would be that they need to actively continue supporting older and older devices. At some point it makes sense to drop active support. If it works, that’s fine, but they won’t continue testing and fixing for unsupported configurations.

            • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They don’t have to. It could just give a warning with something along the lines “Your current hardware setup is not supported by Windows® 11. By continuing you acknowledge that you’re proceeding with the upgrade at your own risk with no guarantees from Microsoft® and that you won’t be entitled to any support from Microsoft. The risks include but are not limited to: OS failing to boot-up; frequent BSOD; programs unable to install; certain parts of Windows® operating system not working; data loss; non-functioning or only partially functioning hardware; violation of applicable laws; permanent hardware damage; or causing damages to property and/or bodily injury, including death as a result of improperly functioning drivers. While we understand this may seem harsh, we do not know how the hardware will perform under these conditions and therefore we want you to understand the potential dangers and that you are responsible for any repercussions. We strongly recommend upgrading your hardware to meet minimum requirements for running Windows 11.”

              “Do you wish to continue with the upgrade?”

        • M500@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hello from a third would country 👋

          Most people here buy computers used that are already pretty old. I can’t see windows cutting off support without offering some kind of upgrade path to this old hardware. Otherwise there will be millions of people used unsupported devices.

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good thing you don’t even need to think about switching for another two years then.

          • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because you think they should pay more for a product they already bought or because privacy and security are not important?

            I said they didn’t have to think bout it for another two years…none of what you’re saying makes sense in relation to that. Its good they don’t need to worry about it (yet), because the issues it may cause them is still far away.

          • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even less of an issue then, why the fuck care if Win11 sucks ass when you’re not even part of their customer base.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it works perfectly fucking fine and people are using it and windows upgrades are more effort than not upgrading. That’s really it.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        🙄 yeah it’s like they’ve gone an written an entirely incompatible desktop with earlier versions with little upgrade path and filled to the brim with incompatibility!

        Oh, that’s Wayland?

        Well it’s not like every other commercially supported OS has an eol with posts support!

        Oh that’s the entire model to support rhel, Debian, etc… I see.

    • knotthatone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s forced obsolescence by a convicted monopolist. Microsoft is effectively withholding security updates from computers built before 2018 or so with the arbitrary TPM requirement to install Win11. While I don’t expect them to support everything forever, this is another step along their journey to make PCs like cellphones. Fixed support periods for no reason other than they want you buying new ones every x years. Next up will be widespread locked down bootloaders so you can’t install Linux if you wanted to. Throw away the old and buy new. Mamma needs more quarterly revenue.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not really forced obsolescence.

        Firstly, you can clean install 11 without TPM no problem, and you can upgrade in place with some tweaks. It’s annoying, but in no way “forced.”

        Secondly, the EOL has been known since original release. We know the EOL of current versions of Windows 11 as well (they moved to supporting specific versions, for instance 21H2 recently went EOL, in October. 23H2 is slotted for EOL in 2026. https://endoflife.date/windows

        Fixed support periods make sense. Otherwise you’re going to have to spring an EOL on people arbitrarily. 10 years of free support on Windows 10, a product most people got for free, seems sane to me. I realize it won’t make sense to everyone.

        Next up will be widespread locked down bootloaders so you can’t install Linux if you wanted to.

        Slippery slope fallacy much?

        • knotthatone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You basically have to break the installer to get it to work, which supports my point that the limit is an arbitrary way to exclude PCs made before a certain date from the next version. There is no technical reason MS can’t allow old hardware to work and no marginal cost to Microsoft to chose to do so. Like I said, while I don’t expect them to support everything forever, Microsoft also made their bed with their illegal business practices that got us here and hordes of malware infested EOL’ed computers are everybody’s problem now. They shouldn’t be adding to that problem for arbitrary marketing reasons.

          I’m not against to fixed support periods, but they really ought to be minimums and not halted based on arbitrary dates, especially in the consumer space where these machines will run whether they get patched or not.

          Slippery slope fallacy much?

          This already happened during the last big Windows-on-ARM push w/ Win8. UEFI secure boot was required enabled on all new hardware but no requirement for user-added keys. It didn’t overtly restrict Linux (on MS’s part) but several manufacturers did lock down their devices. I don’t see any reason why that won’t happen again. It’s the norm in the cell phone and tablet ecosystem (which is a damn shame, but there may be hope on the regulatory front w/ right to repair laws gaining steam.)

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Break the installer? Two values get flipped. Hell you can have Rufus do it for you if you’re not tech savvy.

            As for all the arbitrary and short dates… most distorts have similar. Look at Ubuntu, all having free support periods of less than 10 years, all having paid support beyond that point for a few years.

            So how long is a reasonable time to support a version of software? 5 years, like Ubuntu? 10 like Windows? Are there even that many that support for longer periods of time?

            I can understand the worry about older hardware, but they have a direction they are choosing to go to make things more secure. Even if there’s an ulterior motive, security isn’t a bad thing to strive for. And if not this version… which? The next? The one after that? Never?

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Congrats on being in a low functioning desktop niche environment which is probably unusable for most users. Nearly every distro has an eol.

            • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              ew, LTS user. lol.
              Actually, 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) doesn’t go EOL until 2028 : ubuntu release cycle, and Ubuntu is very much targeted at enterprise users, it’s what Canonical’s entire profit model is focused around.
              The thing is, one version of a distro going EOL doesn’t turn a shitload of hardware into e-waste.
              The drivers have to be dropped from the kernel to truly be EOL which doesn’t happen until nearly everyone has already moved on which could be 20y possibly even more from when the hardware was first manufactured. Meanwhile my 2018 & 2020 hp laptops are completely dropped in Windows 11.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The EOL is 2023, the pro support EOL is 2028.

                While I get what you’re saying, everything is echoed pretty easily to windows, apart from the fact that it doesn’t have distros (for the most part.)

                And to be clear, Windows 11 can be installed on any device Windows 10 can, just needs a clean install and/or some tweaking.

                • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve tried installing Windows 11 on my 2020 HP laptop. It does not work, no amount of tinkering will save it.

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as industry goes it’s a bit short

      Industry standard is 5-6 years of support. After that, you replace the PC anyway.

      • sederx
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        After that, you replace the PC anyway.

        you really dont have to though

        • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In enterprise, you generally do.
          You don’t have to throw it away, just sell it, donate it or use it privately.

          • sederx
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            no? if theres no need to upgrade machine you just dont. most enterprise do because that shit is not supported anymore, so if they are internet enabled they dont have much choice.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Don’t have to” and “don’t” are different things. I’ve never been in an enterprise environment that kept PCs much beyond their 2/3 year service window.

          In fact, they messed up and got consumer hardware once. They EOLd the devices at 6 months when they realized they only got a month of support.

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really depends on the industry I guess…we meet a lot of old XP and Win7 machines when visiting sites. Engineering stations rarely get updated unless the hardwares breaks, and a lot of software used to service the machines/production line from the engineering station often don’t run on a never OS.

    • Vinny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Technologically, Window is great. There is no denying that, and if anything some the dated (+ insecure) things on it is the result of its own success, i.e. the app installation and management process, as it is hard to convince billions of people to do anything different.

      On the other hand, the management of the company is the biggest problem with everything in and around Window. First, there is no single business model; MS sells you a 1 time licence for the OS itself, but then constantly try to harvest and sell your data (with ads everywhere in Windows 11), and if you want to do any office work then you have to pay a subscription for MS 365. Last but not least, they keep breaking things every few updates, i.e. I actually failed one of my university course because OneDrive decided that my report don’t need to exist after an update (in 2018).

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This community hates Microsoft. They just want to shout about them while ignoring paid support for extended life Linux.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suspect that despite not supporting it with security updates, the juicy telemetry will still be collected and sold to data brokers.

      • Efwis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been on Linux for 20+ years and have never had to rely on paid for support. The paid for support is really geared towards professional big business work stations and server stacks. If you need support for Linux you can find free support on their forums 99% of the time. It’s the IT departments with lazy techs that rely on Linux paid support.

        You are right about the Micro$uck hate though. Why should I pay to use an operating system on a computer I buy and use until it’s reached it’s EOL when I can use Linux to do everything you do on windows and I don’t have to pay for the software? In today’s economy, it makes sense to use Linux.

      • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They just want to shout about them while ignoring paid support for extended life Linux.

        Ironically, you’re just shouting about linux while ignoring the context behind the paid support for “extended life linux”

        The paid support is for enterprise linux distros like Red Hat. This support is aimed at businesses. Not regular end users.

        Regular users can get Long Term Support (LTS) versions of regular distros entirely free. Such as Ubuntu’s LTS versions. With the cool addition of being able to freely move to the next LTS version whenever that comes out to replace the current LTS version.

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          How long is Ubuntu lts supported? Oh 10 years? And how old will Windows 10 be in 25? 10 years old?!!! WEIRD!

          • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            At least you don’t have to pay for the next LTS version of ubuntu. Nor do you have to meet daft hardware requirements to upgrade to the next LTS. You can just seamlessly upgrade to the next LTS version.

            Unlike Windows.

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not gonna pay for updates, I’m just stick with my old win 7 untill the end. Glad i take the right decision to full backup 8 years ago
    Although i never got updates or can run modern apps anymore, at least i got very stable & less annoying windows

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    As it has done for other stubbornly popular versions of Windows, though, Microsoft is offering a reprieve for those who want or need to stay on Windows 10: three additional years of security updates, provided to those who can pay for the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program.

    The initial announcement, written by Windows Servicing and Delivery Principal Product Manager Jason Leznek, spends most of its time encouraging users and businesses to upgrade to Windows 11 rather than staying on 10, either by updating their current computers, upgrading to new PCs or transitioning to a Windows 365 cloud-based PC instead.

    The company told us that “pricing will be provided at a later date,” but for the Windows 7 version of the ESU program, Microsoft upped the cost of the program each year to encourage people to upgrade to a newer Windows version before they absolutely had to; the cost was also per-seat, so what you paid was proportional to the number of PCs you needed updates for.

    Windows 10 has mostly been in a security-updates-only maintenance mode since the 22H2 update came out late last year, but Microsoft did “revisit” the operating system last month to add the Copilot generative AI assistant and a handful of other tweaks.

    For businesses, educational institutions, or governments, the point of the ESU program has always been to buy slow-moving IT shops extra time to learn about the new features in newer versions of Windows, to educate and inform users about the upgrade, and to test for incompatibilities with other mission-critical hardware and software.

    Windows 11’s new system requirements add an additional wrinkle, though—not every single Windows 10 PC in every single organization officially supports Windows 11, adding the time and cost of hardware replacement (or migrating to a cloud-based setup) to the time and cost of changing operating system versions.


    The original article contains 620 words, the summary contains 306 words. Saved 51%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!