jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down124cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1623arrow-down1imageknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldjroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square146fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoMost languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah it’s nice to be able to see it
Most languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
Yeah it’s nice to be able to see it