The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m legit unsure whether your argument is purposely bad or you just don’t know that it is.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because the issue at hand is more like if you bought tickets to the circus, but when you went to go see it you were told the circus isn’t there anymore and you don’t get a refund.

        That I would definately call stealing, and if I wanted to see the circus the next time it was in town I would absolutely sneak in.

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s like you bought a circus membership to watch the circus at a particular venue as many times as you want. You watched the circus a few dozen times, then one day the circus announces they won’t be going to that venue anymore and you can’t watch it anymore.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is where the analogy breaks down, because the circus requires people and an area to operate in. Digital movies and TV shows should just require my device to watch it on.

            To strain the metaphor further: The Circus leaving the venue isn’t leaving town, they’re just moving across the street. But your tickets are only valid for the old venue. Do you expect people to purchase new tickets or just sneak in?

            There’s also the people who purchased a lifetime membership to the circus and then were told the next day “The circus will no longer be going to that venue anymore after the end of the month.”

            The expectation is that I purchased this media and can watch it as much as I want, whenever I want, for the rest of my life. When companies say “Lol, no. Fine print” reasonable people aren’t going to shrug their shoulders and say “You got me, I guess I’ll purchase more things.” They’ll say “screw that, I can get it for free and keep it forever, what service are you providing that’s better?”

        • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          A more honest analogy for the situation was that there are very few incidents of circuses doing that and now people demand it’s morally justified to get free entrance to every circus, concert, fair, museum, …

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              But people aren’t just sharing media that is affected. They pirate everything, even when there are ways to buy and own it.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But people aren’t just sharing media that is affected. They pirate everything, even when there are ways to buy and own it.

                “Some people speed on roads, so all roads are bad.”

                This conversation is about media you can’t buy and own.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a thousand times better than this empty garbage. How does this have any upvotes?