Thank Fook no more hyperloop projects were funded.
Hyperloop was such a red herring I was too young to know but how DA FAQ did adults fall for that scam?
The same way they were wooed by automakers, steel and oil companies in the 20th century
I am very much aware of the historical corruption.
It was sold as good for us. They took the money and now fucking us. Point being state funded capitalism doesn’t work for the working class.
Train project is no doubt good. But gives away got to stop. They want fed capital, taxpayer gets a steak.
Not whatever this clown shit is. We pay them our taxes, we bail them out and they treat us like shit…
Air travel is the recent offender… 50 billion to be treated like a run brain dead peon.
So in grand scheme this charity aitn the worst.
But it should be called for what it is and people should lobby for the state to take equity position. That way we can at least recoup the investment for future deplapymeny of capital into public benefiting projects.
First of all, woot, trains.
But this is a smaller section of high speed rail. One Vegas wanted and offered to pay for if memory serves. For a $4.2B project, $3.25B in tax exempt bonds were already authorized. Now another $3B? Looot of money flowing towards this project to get people to casinos. Hope accounting is up to par.
California does have another high speed rail that republicans have fought every step of the way. There is progress, but slow. Could probably toss some of that over budget excess our way to help out. Just say’n.
The budget excess earmarked for someone’s not-so-subtle rainy day fund?
The same funding package gave the Bakersfield to Merced high speed project $3.1 billion so they could buy trains and start running by 2030. The San Francisco to Los Angeles project was originally supposed to cost $9 billion but it’s now estimated between $90 and $120 billion.
Brightline looks like a bargain compared to CHSR.
The Bakersfield to Merced* project, and the Central Valley portion is now estimated at $30bil; if you’re going to rag on it get your facts right.
Love giving public money to private infrastructure.
Mixed ownership of rail isn’t uncommon in the world, but yeah its a bit shit.
As a counter point, Brightline is basically the only private company to stand up a successful US commuter rail line in decades, so it makes sense to give them a boost here.
Somebody needs to build that fucking train, and they built one like it in rail hostile florida. That one is diesel because “reasons” but this one will be a sane electric.
There was a plan for actual HSR in Florida using the same ROW as Brightline. It was torpedoed by former governor and current senator Rick Scott. They sent money back to the Obama administration both because they didn’t want the Democrats to get a win and also because of their privatization/kickback fetish.
Same exact thing happened in Ohio in 2010, Kasich sent the money back.
Also in Wisconsin
If the taxpayer is providing them with serious capital infusion, why is taxpayer not taking equity position in the venture?
It’s called subsidizing, and it’s used by governments to encourage projects that will provide a public good. While I agree that it would be ideal if the rail infrastructure was owned and operated by public organizations rather than corporations, we still get many of the benefits of the new infrastructure with much less of the costs (to the budget directly).
I would also be very surprised if the 3b didn’t come with some additional requirements that Brightline has to meet. The government is not in the business of making money, so an equity stake is way less valuable than being able to force the company to do certain things.
You mean like they force freight rail companies to give priority to Amtrak?
Asking for a friend
And destroying the desert landscape in the process. Let’s add hundreds of miles of high speed rail on top of I-15, the miles of freight rail, old mines, new lithium mining, all the military bases, and all the solar and wind farms to the delicate biosphere that hasn’t changed in a million years. Awesome.
Anyway, this country needs proper intercity and urban rail like yesterday.
I feel like with 3B they should at least be able to electrify the existing tracks between Rancho Cucamonga and LA Union, and have Brightline stop there. Would make the whole thing so much nicer.
Probably more important to get the project completed first. It’s not a perfect project by any means, but it’s still pretty good overall.
Is government getting equity stake in the venture?
Is this more corporate charity although with a noble cause?
Will taxpayers get reduced fairs from this?
deleted by creator
What is the point? There is nothing in Las Vegas except gambling and prostitutes. Hardly enough to justify the cost.
… There are planes and cars in enormous numbers that go from there to LA… It doesn’t matter how you judge their choices, it matters because it dramatically cuts car and plane usage and replaces it with far more efficient transportation.
LA to Vegas is the busiest flight corridor in the US.
Today, NFL, NHL, and WNBA. In a few years, MLB, NBA, and MLS teams. Plus sports betting and legal cannabis.
The high-speed rail makes it easier to shuttle a massive population from SoCal over cheaply.
Easier than bussing all those grannies I suppose.
Literally true.
If they pays, they stays.
deleted by creator
Unsure if you’ve heard, but a lot of people are willing to travel for gambling and prostitutes
